Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification – How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification – How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification—How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 | 10am PST – 1pm EST – 7pm CET

 

Seamless onboarding is critical to building trust with new clients, providing the foundation of a solid relationship. But in a digital-first world, clients expect non-face-to-face meetings for their health and well-being.

Corporate KYC, also known as Know-Your-Business (KYB), has become a critical process in determining high-risk corporate clients and learning where organizations can take steps to mitigate any potential fraud or illicit activity from impacting their bottom line.

From receiving company documents to verifying ultimate beneficial owners, how can you be sure that your screening and onboarding processes are properly screening for all risk factors while continuing to build a relationship of trust with your corporate clients?

Join “From Nomination to Verification: How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation“, our live fireside chat with industry experts and thought leaders to discuss:

  • How to better identify risk factors when onboarding your corporate clients
  • What regulators require from you when verifying corporate entities 
  • How to choose the right vendor partners for onboarding and screening
  • How technology is changing the game for compliance teams in a contactless world

Join us for this free Fireside Chat on October 22nd at 10am PST / 1pm EST featuring a live panel of trusted experts from around the globe. 

GUEST PANELISTS

Chris Gschwend | Senior Compliance Advisor, MME

Chris Gschwend advises corporate clients in the areas of anti-money laundering, trade controls, sanctions, and customs management. She specializes in the implementation of FinTech and traditional compliance programs and has over 10 years of experience in managing global compliance teams in the aerospace and manufacturing industries. Chris Gschwend also brings public sector experience, having developed trade policies and negotiated free trade agreements for Canada Customs (CBSA).

Amber Scott | Founder & CEO, Outlier Compliance Group

Amber has broad-based financial compliance experience that includes insurance, mutual funds, and banking. In addition to being a Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), Amber is also a Certified Privacy Professional (CIPP). She also holds a mutual fund sales designation from the Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) and a first level Fellow, Life Management Institute (FLMI).

Gueorgui Gotzev | International Counsel, Kohler Gotzev

Gueorgui has a broad academic and operational experience in capital markets, bank & finance, alternative investment funds, distributed ledger technology (DLT), and Virtual Asset Services Providers (VASPs). He helps restructure, digitalized, optimize, and outsource any part of a fund’s investment management and central administration burdens. He loves consulting on process optimization and investor onboarding automation, KYC, AML/CFT, and CRS/FATCA compliance. Gueorgui holds an LL.M. in International Financial Law from the University of Paris 1 – Panthéon Sorbonne and has completed a full qualification course in Luxembourg law (CCDL) from the University of Luxembourg.

About iComply
iComply Investor Services Inc. (“iComply”) is a Regtech company that provides fully-digital KYC and AML compliance solutions for non-face-to-face financial and legal interactions. iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience. By partnering with multinational technology vendors such as Microsoft, DocuSign, Thomson Reuters and Refinitiv, iComply is bringing compliance teams into the digital age. Learn more: www.icomplyis.com

 

January 2021 Regulatory Updates
January 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory actions and industry updates from financial authorities and regulators around the globe in January 2021

December 2020 Regulatory Updates
December 2020 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory actions and industry updates from financial authorities and regulators around the globe in December 2020

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

Jonathan C. Dunsmoor of Dunsmoor Law, P.C. discusses the impact of the 12-month review of the revised FAFT standards on the virtual asset industry

What happened​?

Overall, both the public and private sectors have made progress by implementing the newly revised FATF Standards, where 35 out of 54 jurisdictions are implementing FATF Standards. Even though there are still issues that need to be addressed, there has been no clear indication of a need to make amendments to the FATF Standards as of yet. This may change dramatically in the coming months, given the recent rise of Decentralized Exchanges (“DEX”) such as Uniswap.

What types of stakeholders will be impacted by this?

Anyone involved with the transmission of virtual currency needs to be aware of the FATF Standards and the applicability both locally and globally to their business operations. This is true regardless of whether the business is in the traditional money services business or in the virtual assets industry.

Why does this matter?

The reason for working diligently to maintain and improve upon these standards is simply to facilitate larger, more compliant business protocols globally. If the proliferation of terrorist financing and/or money laundering can be reduced, then the facilitation of greater access to investment opportunities can arise where transmission standards are respected and maintained.

Does this update/change create new opportunities? If so, what might they be?

Yes, the changes in the implementation and constant movement in technology regarding virtual assets will provide opportunities for further development of risk assessment departments in businesses, and the training and implementation of new technology tools will create a need for experts in these technologies and related industries. This is especially true for new asset classes and key threshold signature wallets.

Does this change create new risks for industry stakeholders? If so, what should they be looking out for?

No, these changes do not create new risks; however, changes in how virtual assets and VASPs are being used do create unknown risks that either have not been identified or lack the option for prevention due to the revised FATF Standards not being implemented within their jurisdiction. If a business engages with virtual assets and/or VASPs, it must be compliant with the law.

How does this impact compliance teams, and what can they do to stay ahead of the regulatory requirements?

There will be a wider need for deeper understanding in terms of the revised FATF Standards, as well as an understanding of the risks associated with virtual assets and VASPs. With the
changes in technology implemented by these avenues, it creates a demand for knowledge on tools and techniques to either prohibit or hinder the use of VASPs. The key will be staying abreast of new knowledge, sharing information, and implementing techniques that have been suggested by other members.

What can management teams or boards of directors do to stay ahead of these changes?

As mentioned, staying abreast of new knowledge presented in regards to the revised FATF Standards, sharing information among teams and the board, and making sure the Board of Directors is doing their due diligence in gaining information from other businesses that are using VASPs.

What can service providers do to help their clients stay ahead of these changes?

Service providers can start by implementing preventative measures under the FATF Standards. It’s important to have an idea of the client…that way, a service provider can perform their due diligence in reporting suspicious activity, screening for compliance issues, and keeping detailed records of their clients’ activities. It is highly recommended that internal protocols be developed and followed, especially for VASPs. This includes cross-border transactions as well as adherence to local laws regarding money transmission.

 

This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please seek competent legal counsel for specific questions or concerns regarding FATF or any topics discussed herein.

Author — JONATHAN C. DUNSMOOR

Jonathan C. Dunsmoor, Esq. is a U.S. corporate attorney who focuses his practice on securities law and regulatory matters, including compliance protocols for blockchain-related offerings, asset management, and corporate governance. He represents private companies wishing to raise funds, including those exploring blockchain/cryptocurrency opportunities, as well as angel investors and investment funds. Jonathan is Senior Of Counsel for the New York-based Reid & Wise, LLC with offices in San Francisco and Shanghai.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals
Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals

With the financial sector moving faster than ever and encountering more unique circumstances due to decentralized competition at the helm, regulatory oversight has become paramount to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and protecting investors. The...

Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age
Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age

With today’s business and financial markets increasingly facing the challenge of keeping up with a rapidly evolving digital world, knowing who you’re dealing with and how to protect sensitive data and assets from being accessed by fraudulent users is essential. Know...

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

Kayvan B. Sadeghi of Schiff Hardin LLP reviews recent actions from both the SEC and CFTC against app developer Abra

What happened​?

On July 13, 2020, the SEC and CFTC each filed settled enforcement actions against Abra and its related company, Plutus Technologies Philippines Corporation.

Abra is a cryptocurrency app developer that offered synthetic exposure to dozens of fiat currencies, digital currencies, and blue-chip stocks and ETFs. They were penalized for structuring and effecting swaps without complying with U.S. securities and commodities laws.

Abra unsuccessfully sought to avoid U.S. laws by excluding U.S. purchasers and moving certain operations out of the U.S. The SEC announcement emphasizes that one “may not evade the federal securities laws merely by transacting primarily with non-U.S. retail investors and setting up a foreign entity to act as a counterparty, while conducting crucial parts of their business in the United States.”

What types of stakeholders will be impacted by this?

This announcement should serve as a caution to anyone seeking to structure their business conduct or offerings to stay outside the reach of U.S. securities and commodities laws.

Why does this matter?

U.S. regulators view the reach of U.S. laws far more broadly than businesses might expect. This action also demonstrates the clear intent of the SEC and CFTC to work together where their jurisdictions may overlap, including in the blockchain space.

Does this change create new risks for industry stakeholders? If so, what should they be looking out for?

This action highlights and increases the regulatory risks for anyone who has sought to stay outside the reach of U.S. laws by excluding U.S. purchasers. The SEC and CFTC likely will now view the market as on notice that the efforts taken by Abra were insufficient.

Does this change create new opportunities for industry stakeholders? If so, what might they be?

Any company that has concerns about compliance with U.S. securities and commodities laws should consider this announcement an opportunity to evaluate with counsel whether to approach the SEC and/or CFTC proactively.

How does this impact compliance teams, and what can they do to stay ahead of the regulatory requirements?

Compliance teams must remain vigilant with KYC and AML requirements, but they must also realize that a well-intentioned and implemented plan to exclude U.S. purchasers is only part of the puzzle, not a complete solution.

What can management teams or boards of directors do to stay ahead of these changes?

Management teams and boards can evaluate with outside counsel both their existing compliance programs and whether to proactively engage regulators through channels such as LabCFTC and SEC’s FinHub.

What can service providers do to help their clients stay ahead of these changes?

Service providers will do well to stay in their lane, understand what risks they can help control, and also where their best efforts alone may fall short of reaching their client’s end goal.

Author — KAYVAN B. SADEGHI

Kayvan B. Sadeghi is a trial and appellate lawyer at Schiff Hardin LLP with more than 15 years of experience in complex commercial and securities litigation, investigations, and enforcement proceedings. He regularly defends clients before the U.S. Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, state attorneys general, and other government agencies. His clients have included leading global companies, and their directors and officers, across a range of industries including financial services, media, technology, and energy.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals
Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals

With the financial sector moving faster than ever and encountering more unique circumstances due to decentralized competition at the helm, regulatory oversight has become paramount to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and protecting investors. The...

Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age
Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age

With today’s business and financial markets increasingly facing the challenge of keeping up with a rapidly evolving digital world, knowing who you’re dealing with and how to protect sensitive data and assets from being accessed by fraudulent users is essential. Know...

Fireside Chat: Is Retail Wealth Management Ready for Virtual Assets?

Fireside Chat: Is Retail Wealth Management Ready for Virtual Assets?

Fireside Chat: Is Retail Wealth Management Ready for Virtual Assets?

Date: Thursday, September 10, 2020 | 10am PST – 1pm EST – 7pm CET

 

While interest in virtual assets from retail investors is surging worldwide, there is still a very limited number of wealth managers who meet the requirements to be able to advise their clients on investments in virtual assets.

Due to regulatory uncertainty and the emerging nature of the virtual asset industry, many wealth managers lack reputable information needed in order to be capable of advising their clients.

Join us for our latest fireside chat “Is Retail Wealth Management Ready for Virtual Assets?” featuring industry experts and thought leaders. In this session, we will cover:

  • What impacts will virtual assets have on the principles of wealth management?
  • What are the risks of making virtual assets available at the retail level?
  • How are regulators in different jurisdictions helping to unlock access to virtual assets for retail investors?
  • How does custody, private key management, and the FATF travel rule impact wealth managers?
  • How are different jurisdictions approaching custody, wallet ownership, and the travel rule?

Join us for this free Fireside Chat on September 10th at 10am PST / 1pm EST featuring a live panel of trusted experts from around the globe. 

About iComply
iComply Investor Services Inc. (“iComply”) is a Regtech company that provides fully-digital KYC and AML compliance solutions for non-face-to-face financial and legal interactions. iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience. By partnering with multinational technology vendors such as Microsoft, DocuSign, Thomson Reuters and Refinitiv, iComply is bringing compliance teams into the digital age. Learn more: www.icomplyis.com

 

January 2021 Regulatory Updates
January 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory actions and industry updates from financial authorities and regulators around the globe in January 2021

December 2020 Regulatory Updates
December 2020 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory actions and industry updates from financial authorities and regulators around the globe in December 2020

Banker and Insurance Agent Banned From Providing Financial Advisory Services in Singapore

Banker and Insurance Agent Banned From Providing Financial Advisory Services in Singapore

Banker and Insurance Agent Banned From Providing Financial Advisory Services in Singapore

MAS issued prohibition orders to two individuals for fraud and dishonest conduct

What Happened?

August 19, 2020: The Monetary Authority of Singapore has issued prohibition orders against Mr. Aw Yong Seng, a former representative of Prudential Assurance Company Singapore Pte Ltd, and Mr. Chew Swee Sun, a former representative of Bank of Singapore Limited.

Both individuals were previously charged with false orders for securities, unauthorized trading, and other violations, and convicted to a sentence of 8 weeks – 4 months imprisonment.

The prohibition order restricts Mr. Aw and Mr. Chew from providing any financial advisory services and taking part in the management of any financial advisory firm.

Source: https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/enforcement/enforcement-actions/2020/mas-bans-two-individuals-for-fraud-and-dishonest-conduct

Who Is Impacted?

Bankers, insurance agents, asset managers, and other financial services professionals.

Why This Matters?

Financial services providers must comply with strong client authentication procedures to capture the client’s consent and authorization prior to executing trade orders.

What’s Next?

To better protect themselves, financial services providers should review their user experience and customer journies through onboarding, KYC review, enhanced due diligence, order management, re-authentication, and transaction processing. Compliance teams should review and assess the risk for each channel of client engagement such as face-to-face, video call, phone, email, messaging, web portal, and mobile application.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals
Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals

With the financial sector moving faster than ever and encountering more unique circumstances due to decentralized competition at the helm, regulatory oversight has become paramount to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and protecting investors. The...

Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age
Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age

With today’s business and financial markets increasingly facing the challenge of keeping up with a rapidly evolving digital world, knowing who you’re dealing with and how to protect sensitive data and assets from being accessed by fraudulent users is essential. Know...

SEC Charges Former Hertz CEO with Filing of Inaccurate Financial Statements

SEC Charges Former Hertz CEO with Filing of Inaccurate Financial Statements

SEC Charges Former Hertz CEO with Filing of Inaccurate Financial Statements

Mark Frissora allegedly pressured his employees to “find money”

What Happened?

August 18, 2020: The Securities and Exchange Commission of the U.S. charged former Hertz CEO Mark Frissora with aiding and abetting the car rental company in filing inaccurate financial statements. According to the SEC, Frissora pressed employees to make changes to the company’s financial reports in 2013.

Frissora is also accused of failing to disclose to investors that the company was keeping cars for longer periods of time to cut down on depreciation costs.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/08/13/former-hertz-ceo-charged-in-accounting-scandal/#3aa81d1f333c

Who Is Impacted?

Frissora has agreed to pay a $200,000 fine to settle the charges with the SEC, and also to repay his former employer $2 million in incentive-based compensation.

Why This Matters?

For all companies, it is important to understand the importance of accuracy in your statements to investors and the public. This SEC enforcement highlights how the regulator is working to maintain checkpoints of accountability within their capital markets.

What’s Next?

Aside from fines, Frissora will be subject to increased scrutiny during Know-Your-Customer (KYC) reviews, as his name will appear in risk-screening results.

Compliance teams can use recent cases like this to test the effectiveness of their compliance systems. Does this name search produce a result in your U.S. screening procedures? If so, how quickly can your compliance workflows identify and present this new risk to your risk management team?

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals
Navigating FINRA Compliance: 5 Key Pillars for Financial Professionals

With the financial sector moving faster than ever and encountering more unique circumstances due to decentralized competition at the helm, regulatory oversight has become paramount to safeguarding the integrity of the financial markets and protecting investors. The...

Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age
Why KYC Matters in the Digital Age

With today’s business and financial markets increasingly facing the challenge of keeping up with a rapidly evolving digital world, knowing who you’re dealing with and how to protect sensitive data and assets from being accessed by fraudulent users is essential. Know...