SEC Emergency Action Stops Virtual Asset Scam
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) freezes Meta 1 Coin Trust’s assets, charges former state senator and associates
What Happened?
March 16th, 2020: the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) obtained an emergency order to freeze the assets of Meta 1 Coin Trust, an unregistered securities offering that was marketed and sold by former Washington State Senator David Schmidt and his associates, Robert Dunlap and Nicole Bowdler of Florida.
These three are being charged with making false and misleading statements to investors, and for misappropriating the funds raised for their own personal expenses and luxury automobile purchases.
Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf
Who Is Impacted?
Any VASP – banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc. – dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.
Why This Matters?
The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.
It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.
What’s Next?
The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.
VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.
Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.
Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.
For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.
learn more
Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?
iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.
Request a demo today.
KYC in Various Industries: Tailoring Compliance to Sector Needs
Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations are fundamental to maintaining security and compliance across different sectors. However, the requirements and practices for KYC can vary significantly depending on the industry. This article...
AML Risk Management: Strategies for managing AML risks in financial institutions.
Managing anti-money laundering (AML) risks is a critical responsibility for financial institutions. Effective AML risk management strategies help institutions identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with money laundering...
Transaction Monitoring Techniques: Methods for effective transaction monitoring to detect suspicious activities.
Transaction monitoring is a critical component in the fight against financial crimes. By continuously analyzing transactions for suspicious activities, financial institutions can detect and prevent fraudulent activities such as...