SEC Emergency Action Stops Virtual Asset Scam
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) freezes Meta 1 Coin Trust’s assets, charges former state senator and associates
What Happened?
March 16th, 2020: the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) obtained an emergency order to freeze the assets of Meta 1 Coin Trust, an unregistered securities offering that was marketed and sold by former Washington State Senator David Schmidt and his associates, Robert Dunlap and Nicole Bowdler of Florida.
These three are being charged with making false and misleading statements to investors, and for misappropriating the funds raised for their own personal expenses and luxury automobile purchases.
Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf
Who Is Impacted?
Any VASP – banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc. – dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.
Why This Matters?
The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.
It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.
What’s Next?
The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.
VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.
Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.
Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.
For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.
learn more
Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?
iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.
Request a demo today.
Risk Management Strategies for AML Compliance
Effective risk management is essential for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance. Financial institutions must identify, assess, and mitigate AML risks to prevent money laundering and ensure regulatory compliance. This article...
Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations are critical for financial institutions worldwide to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. This article provides an overview of global AML regulations, highlighting the key...
Comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering Solutions for Modern Financial Institutions
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solutions are essential for modern financial institutions to detect, prevent, and report money laundering activities. This article explores comprehensive AML solutions, highlighting effective...