SEC Emergency Action Stops Virtual Asset Scam

Mar 16, 2020 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) freezes Meta 1 Coin Trust’s assets, charges former state senator and associates

What Happened?

March 16th, 2020: the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) obtained an emergency order to freeze the assets of Meta 1 Coin Trust, an unregistered securities offering that was marketed and sold by former Washington State Senator David Schmidt and his associates, Robert Dunlap and Nicole Bowdler of Florida.

These three are being charged with making false and misleading statements to investors, and for misappropriating the funds raised for their own personal expenses and luxury automobile purchases.​

Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf

Who Is Impacted?

Any VASP – banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc. – dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.

Why This Matters?

The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.

It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.

What’s Next?

The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.

VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.

Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.

Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.

For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Challenges in KYC Compliance and How to Overcome Them
Challenges in KYC Compliance and How to Overcome Them

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is vital for financial institutions, but it comes with several challenges. These challenges can hinder the effectiveness of KYC processes and pose risks to compliance efforts. This article...

The Importance of KYC Compliance in Financial Services
The Importance of KYC Compliance in Financial Services

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is a critical aspect of financial services. It ensures that financial institutions verify the identities of their customers, assess risks, and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and fraud. This article explores the...

AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices
AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) technology is revolutionizing compliance practices in financial institutions. Advanced tools and technologies enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AML efforts, helping organizations detect, prevent,...