SEC Ruling Issued Against BitClave ICO
Unregistered $25.5-million ICO issuer ordered to return money to investors
What Happened?
May 28, 2020: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found BitClave PTE Ltd. of San Jose, California conducted an unregistered Initial Coin Offering (ICO) between June and November 2017.
Source: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-124
Who Is Impacted?
The 9,500+ investors who invested USD $25.5 million into BitClave’s Consumer Activity Token (CAT).
Why This Matters?
Because it was never registered as a security, the public sale of the CAT token violated the registration provisions of federal securities laws in the United States.
In the US, securities issuers must follow registration requirements, or use a registration exemption such as Reg D or Reg CF. Token issuers that use US exemptions must follow specific restrictions and thresholds – for both the primary sale and the secondary market of any security they issue. BitClave has been ordered by the SEC to return all the funds they acquired through this token sale.
What’s Next?
Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, BitClave has agreed to pay a total disgorgement of USD $25,500,000, a prejudgment interest of USD $3,444,197, and a penalty of USD $400,000. The SEC’s order also establishes a Fair Fund to return monies paid by BitClave to the 9,500+ injured investors.
Finally, BitClave has also agreed to transfer all of the remaining CAT in its possession to the fund administrator for permanent disabling, publish a notice of the SEC’s order through their site, and request the removal of CAT from all virtual asset trading platforms currently listed for sale or trade.
learn more
Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?
iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.
Request a demo today.
FATF Guidance For a Risk-Based Approached: Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) first began weighing in on Cryptocurrency and Virtual Assets in June, 2014. In 2015 the FATF’s guidance was focused on the interfaces between fiat currency and virtual currency. Since that time, the FATF and its 39 member...
FinCEN Provides Further Clarification on Regulations for Virtual Asset Service Providers
On May 9th, 2019, FinCEN released interpretive guidance on how existing regulations impact cryptocurrencies, which are referred to as Convertible Virtual Currencies. While the “guidance does not establish any new regulatory expectations or requirements,” it does...
FATF Prepares Massive Changes for Virtual Asset Regulation
During May 6-10, 2019, the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) held a private sector consultation on new AML policies related to "virtual assets" and "virtual asset service providers." Representatives including regulators, financial intelligence units, financial...
