SEC Emergency Action Stops Virtual Asset Scam

Mar 16, 2020 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) freezes Meta 1 Coin Trust’s assets, charges former state senator and associates

What Happened?

March 16th, 2020: the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) obtained an emergency order to freeze the assets of Meta 1 Coin Trust, an unregistered securities offering that was marketed and sold by former Washington State Senator David Schmidt and his associates, Robert Dunlap and Nicole Bowdler of Florida.

These three are being charged with making false and misleading statements to investors, and for misappropriating the funds raised for their own personal expenses and luxury automobile purchases.​

Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf

Who Is Impacted?

Any VASP – banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc. – dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.

Why This Matters?

The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.

It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.

What’s Next?

The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.

VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.

Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.

Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.

For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Assessing Customer Risk with Automated KYB, KYC, and AML Software
Assessing Customer Risk with Automated KYB, KYC, and AML Software

With financial crime, fraud, and money laundering quickly taking precedence as some of the most aggressively expanding forms of crime across the globe, having a risk-based approach to monitoring your current customer base, as well as verifying the identities of new...

KYC for Banking – Made Simple with iComply
KYC for Banking – Made Simple with iComply

Is your banking institution set up for success and compliance in 2023? With the financial and digital asset markets experiencing a tumultuous time after the extreme fluctuations faced during the peak of COVID-19, there’s never been a more important time to double down...

How to Spot Fraudulent Users with KYC Protocols
How to Spot Fraudulent Users with KYC Protocols

While we often speak about the many risks and crimes that Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols help to circumvent (the reactive approach), the cybersecurity industry can sometimes forget to highlight the specific ways KYC software and practices offer protection (the...