SEC Emergency Action Stops Virtual Asset Scam

Mar 16, 2020 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) freezes Meta 1 Coin Trust’s assets, charges former state senator and associates

What Happened?

March 16th, 2020: the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) obtained an emergency order to freeze the assets of Meta 1 Coin Trust, an unregistered securities offering that was marketed and sold by former Washington State Senator David Schmidt and his associates, Robert Dunlap and Nicole Bowdler of Florida.

These three are being charged with making false and misleading statements to investors, and for misappropriating the funds raised for their own personal expenses and luxury automobile purchases.​

Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf

Who Is Impacted?

Any VASP – banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc. – dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.

Why This Matters?

The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.

It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.

What’s Next?

The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.

VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.

Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.

Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.

For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

The Future of KYC: A Digital Journey Through Verification
The Future of KYC: A Digital Journey Through Verification

The Future of KYC: A Seamless Digital Experience

Explore how modern KYC technology is transforming identity verification, making it faster, more secure, and user-friendly. Discover the benefits of biometric authentication, blockchain security, and self-sovereign identity.

The Lifecycle of Dirty Money: How AML Checks Turn the Tide
The Lifecycle of Dirty Money: How AML Checks Turn the Tide

The Journey of Laundered Money: A Deep Dive into AML Compliance

Follow the path of “dirty money” through its three stages – placement, layering, and integration – and discover how robust AML processes can break the chain at each step.

Four AML Myths Commonly Found in US Companies
Four AML Myths Commonly Found in US Companies

Debunk common myths about global sanctions, PEP, and AML screening in this guide for US businesses. Learn why even domestic companies need global compliance, and discover how iComply’s tools streamline screening, uncover hidden risks, and ensure regulatory readiness.