Securities Commissions Targets OTC and Virtual Asset Trading Platform BitPrime
What Happened?
February 20, 2020: The BCSC identified that due to an inadequate KYC & AML program, Bitprime Ltd was onboarding clients they were not allowed to serve. BitPrime operates a platform that offers the retail trading of cryptocurrency assets.
Source: https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Enforcement/Investment_Caution_List/Bitprime_Ltd__dba_Bitprimeprofx/
Who Is Impacted?
Fintech platforms, wealth managers, VASPs, and financial service providers who are serving users, clients, or investors in more than one jurisdiction.
Why This Matters?
Many online financial services businesses who have acquired licensing in a single jurisdiction believe that their license means they can serve the world.
This regulatory action shows that the BCSC, along with other IOSC (International Organization of Securities Commissions) members – which includes the U.S., the EU, Canada, Australia, and others – have a very different opinion on the matter.
The reality is, you can only serve the jurisdictions where you have both a license to operate in and a compliance program in place capable of meeting the local regulations of your user.
What’s Next?
BitPrime’s actions have placed the company on several international watchlists and adverse media lists. Companies and virtual asset traders who do business with BitPrime may now be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, and they are likely to start showing up in the more sophisticated blockchain forensics tools.
To avoid this situation, BitPrime could have used a digital onboarding tool that had the capability to identify the prospective user’s jurisdiction, preventing those user accounts from being created.
While this is a relatively simple gap to close, most fintech platforms do not understand how vital it is to screen for this type of risk.
In order to avoid these regulatory actions, fintech platforms should test their compliance systems to ensure their onboarding tools can reject a user based on jurisdiction. Furthermore, these tools should be smart enough to identify and reject these users without incurring the full cost of KYC.
Executives should ensure their compliance teams are saving time and money by not wasting resources through onboarding and screening clients that the business is not able to serve.
learn more
Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?
iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.
Request a demo today.
Corporate Due Diligence: Putting the KYB in KYC
Do you know who you’re doing business with? Corporate due diligence, Know Your Business (KYB), and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols are essential safeguards against money laundering, fraud, and misappropriation of funds for criminal purposes. From onboarding new...
Uncovering the Risks of Synthetic Identities
Meet “Joe Smith”, your suspiciously-good-on-paper prospective client applying for a line of credit. While many of Joe’s details seem to be tied to real documents like a valid Social Insurance or Social Security Number (SIN/SNN), address, and (of course) a glowing...
Stepping Up Your AML Practices in 2023
As we ease into 2023 and reflect on the ever-evolving world of digital security, there’s no denying that fraudsters have become incredibly advanced in their approach—an estimated 90% of money laundering crimes still go undetected—making AML protocols more important...