Securities Commissions Targets OTC and Virtual Asset Trading Platform BitPrime

Feb 21, 2020 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

Regulators Take Action Against Bitprime Ltd For Onboarding Users Without Local Licensing.

What Happened?

February 20, 2020: The BCSC identified that due to an inadequate KYC & AML program, Bitprime Ltd was onboarding clients they were not allowed to serve. BitPrime operates a platform that offers the retail trading of cryptocurrency assets.

Source: https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Enforcement/Investment_Caution_List/Bitprime_Ltd__dba_Bitprimeprofx/

Who Is Impacted?

Fintech platforms, wealth managers, VASPs, and financial service providers who are serving users, clients, or investors in more than one jurisdiction.

Why This Matters?

Many online financial services businesses who have acquired licensing in a single jurisdiction believe that their license means they can serve the world.

This regulatory action shows that the BCSC, along with other IOSC (International Organization of Securities Commissions) members – which includes the U.S., the EU, Canada, Australia, and others – have a very different opinion on the matter.

The reality is, you can only serve the jurisdictions where you have both a license to operate in and a compliance program in place capable of meeting the local regulations of your user.

What’s Next?

BitPrime’s actions have placed the company on several international watchlists and adverse media lists. Companies and virtual asset traders who do business with BitPrime may now be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, and they are likely to start showing up in the more sophisticated blockchain forensics tools.

To avoid this situation, BitPrime could have used a digital onboarding tool that had the capability to identify the prospective user’s jurisdiction, preventing those user accounts from being created.

While this is a relatively simple gap to close, most fintech platforms do not understand how vital it is to screen for this type of risk.

In order to avoid these regulatory actions, fintech platforms should test their compliance systems to ensure their onboarding tools can reject a user based on jurisdiction. Furthermore, these tools should be smart enough to identify and reject these users without incurring the full cost of KYC.

Executives should ensure their compliance teams are saving time and money by not wasting resources through onboarding and screening clients that the business is not able to serve.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

The Lifecycle of Dirty Money: How AML Checks Turn the Tide
The Lifecycle of Dirty Money: How AML Checks Turn the Tide

The Journey of Laundered Money: A Deep Dive into AML Compliance

Follow the path of “dirty money” through its three stages – placement, layering, and integration – and discover how robust AML processes can break the chain at each step.

Four AML Myths Commonly Found in US Companies
Four AML Myths Commonly Found in US Companies

Debunk common myths about global sanctions, PEP, and AML screening in this guide for US businesses. Learn why even domestic companies need global compliance, and discover how iComply’s tools streamline screening, uncover hidden risks, and ensure regulatory readiness.

The Top Cybersecurity Threats of 2025 and How to Protect Yourself
The Top Cybersecurity Threats of 2025 and How to Protect Yourself

Uncover the biggest cybersecurity threats of 2025, from advanced phishing to ransomware and deepfakes. Learn how iComply’s innovative live face match technology revolutionizes security with real-time, on-device biometric authentication, protecting user privacy, ensuring consent, and eliminating vulnerabilities in the digital age.