Ethics of AI in Facial Recognition – Credit Unions

Ethics of AI in Facial Recognition – Credit Unions

Ethics of AI in Facial Recognition – Credit Unions

Barb MacLean, VP of Integration & Analytics at Celero, discusses the responsibility and ethical impacts of credit unions using facial recognition in their back office

What are the top challenges facing credit unions in today’s marketplace​?

Differentiation. Why would someone choose a credit union over another financial services provider? There is a huge opportunity for credit unions to work for a new kind of member who wants to support their local community, wants to derive value from associating with a banking provider vs just paying fees to a faceless and valueless corporate entity, who shares the values (and shares in the value) of the environmental, social and corporate governance that credit unions are well-positioned to provide. And that credit union may only provide a small part of the overall financial services capabilities that a member needs. Credit unions have a long history of working on behalf of affinity groups. The perspective of who has an affinity for what purpose needs to shift to harness global mobility and association. And if credit unions collectively aren’t focused on enabling people who for many reasons aren’t well served by traditional financial services, then as an industry we’re doing it wrong.

The building blocks of the technology needed to provide financial services are getting cheaper, but the skillsets and mindsets ready and knowledgeable about how to use modern technology can be hard to find. Changing the traditional ways of making decisions and running a business – decisions by committee(s) who sometimes have no experience with the new possibilities that commoditized cloud-based service unlock, fixed budget cycles and related fixed multi-year roadmaps, reliance on the same business model that was built for the paper-based industrial age – is key to enabling future-focused innovation.

 

How have credit unions adapted to digital customer journeys?

Credit unions have focused on enabling truly digital journeys, something that aligns to the members’ expectation of being able to start, pause, and complete at a time and place, and using the method or device of their choosing. For a new member joining a credit union, that experience should be a positive one. And if that member is choosing to interact with the credit union in the time and place of their choosing that doesn’t involve the credit union branch, you obviously need to be able to actually enable them to complete all of the steps without needing to wait for someone in the credit union back office to take an action. Credit unions have focused on where they can remove friction points in that journey, minimize the time to accessing the capability they’re looking for, whether that’s an ability to go pay a bill or send an eTransfer to a friend.

 

How much of a role did the global health crisis play in the transition to digital-first tools?

Many credit unions were already there. There are some great examples of credit unions that have been doing this for years, such as Implicity Financial, Outlook Financial, Achieva Financial, Accelerate Financial. And those are just examples from Manitoba! But clearly, things changed completely for everyone in the last 16 months. And in conjunction credit unions have been focused on many avenues to ensure they stay connected to their members, from ensuring they have secure access to their systems outside their branch network to be able to work remotely, to moving workloads to cloud-hosted systems.

 

What are the top misconceptions that banking/credit union customers have about facial
recognition tools?

There are concerns about security and privacy. What is that information being used for? It’s one thing to use other mechanisms for authentication and authorization, like a password that you can change. But you can’t go and get a new face. A second is that it is hard to implement. As with many new technologies, human change and helping people to understand and change their behaviours is the harder part, not necessarily that it’s hard to implement technically.

 

How has facial recognition transformed the way credit unions perform remote identity
verification today?

It’s not transformational yet. The adoption of using facial recognition amongst credit unions is still low.

 

What ethical considerations should credit unions account for when building out digital
customer journeys and services that utilize facial recognition?

Ethics is such an important discussion that doesn’t get enough airtime. Credit unions should be asking and answering questions like: do members understand how their information is being collected, used, stored, and shared? How is their consent being gathered, and how can they withdraw their consent? How are vendors of the tools and technology underpinning the solutions we use for facial recognition building with an ethics-first mindset? How are biases within the data used to create the models that assess the facial recognition images removed? What recourse or support will members have when they believe their data has been used inappropriately? Who has accountability?

 

 

What considerations should be taken when implementing facial recognition into a company’s back-office onboarding workflows? (Essentially, how would this impact credit unions in day-to-day operations?)

Start with re-examining the process entirely. Better yet, start with the end in mind: how would you go about this if you were a new financial institution, with a focus on meeting the member’s needs and creating an experience that best satisfied their jobs to do, vs your own. And in envisioning that future state, it will become clear what will need to change to get there vs how you are doing things today. And then you can focus on how the tools and technology will enable the people on your teams who are supporting this member journey, vs ending up in a scenario where any question on what happens in the process is “the computer says so”. That enabling of your teams is key to unlocking where the true value of the human is in a digital process.

 

What data privacy and security measures should credit unions put into practice when using facial recognition?

Embed privacy and security at the time of design. Many best practice examples from OWASP to Microsoft are broadly applicable to any solution design, including those that make specific use of facial recognition. Credit unions should also consider balancing risk management and fostering innovation as equally important objectives. Risk will never be completely eliminated, so focus instead on leveraging a financial institution’s core competency of managing, and pricing. Is a well-proven, understandable, and replicable facial recognition algorithm more or less risky than requesting a human verify the authenticity of an identification document?

 

 

Anything else you would like to share with our audience that wasn’t covered above?

Some further reading for those interested in the topic and ethics in technology in general, including the 10 principles of Canada’s Digital Charter, is listed below:

 

 

Author — BARB MACLEAN

Barb MacLean is the VP of Integration & Analytics at Celero. She has spent 20 years learning, implementing, and building banking, payments, and integration platforms for Canadian credit unions. If you ever need a phone-a-friend for Star Wars trivia or a last-minute karaoke buddy, you can tweet @barbmaclean.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights
– May 2021

 

United States: 

 

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged BitConnect and five individuals for allegedly promoting a global unregistered digital asset securities offering that raised over $2 billion from retail investors.

 

  • SEC charged Under Armour Inc. with failing to adequately disclose known uncertainties concerning its future revenue prospects and misleading investors. Under Armour agreed to a $9 million settlement.

 

  • SEC charged Colorado-based GWFS Equities Inc. for failures related to filing suspicious activity reports (SARs). GWFS agreed to a settlement that imposes a $1.5 million penalty, a censure, and an order to cease and desist from future violations.

 

  • SEC charged New Jersey-based healthcare company Premier Healthcare Solution LLC and its founder, Josiah David (formerly known as Dennis Lee) with fraudulently raising almost $4 million from over 130 investors nationwide.

 

  • The SEC charged LJM Funds Management Ltd., LJM Partners Ltd., and their portfolio managers with fraudulently misleading investors regarding investment risks, resulting in a $1 billion trading loss.

 

  • The SEC charged and fined S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC $9 million for failures relating to a previously undisclosed quality control feature of one of its volatility-related indices, which led S&P DJI to publish and disseminate stale index values during a period of unprecedented volatility. 

 

United Kingdom:

 

  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined Sapien Capital Ltd £178,000 for serious financial crime control failings in relation to cum/ex trading, which led to the risk of facilitating fraudulent trading and money laundering.

 

  • The FCA charged Ian Hudson with fraudulent trading and carrying on regulated activities without authorization.

 

Hong Kong:

 

  • The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) reprimanded and fined Ewarton Securities Limited $1.5 million for breaches and failures of internal controls.

 

  • The Market Misconduct Tribunal (MMT) fined China Medical & HealthCare Group Limited (formerly COL Capital Limited) and six former and current directors $4.2 million for failing to disclose inside information following SFC proceedings.

 

 

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

April 2021 Regulatory Updates

April 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights
– April 2021

 

United States: 

 

  • The SEC awarded over USD $3 million to two whistleblowers who brought to light key issues and violations to help improve SEC’s ongoing compliance efforts.

 

  • SEC filed charges against 8 companies for failing to disclose complete reporting information on required Form 12b-25 filings.

 

  • The SEC charged fund manager and former race car team owner Andrew T. Franzone with multimillion-dollar investment fraud and misappropriation scheme.

 

  • The SEC filed charges against Spot Tech House Ltd., a binary options trading platform, and two of its top executives with defrauding investors out of more than USD $100 million through unregistered online sales.

 

  • The SEC charged seven individuals with defrauding investors out of more than USD $16 million through an oil-and-gas market manipulation scheme.

 

United Kingdom:

 

  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) commenced criminal proceedings against 2 individuals for conducting unauthorized regulated business activities in the UK.

 

  • The FCA banned and fined UK financial adviser Simon Varley £68,300 for providing unqualified, dishonest financial advice to retail customers.

 

Hong Kong:

 

  • The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) fined Optimas Capital Limited $1.05 million over multiple failures with their short position reporting processes.

 

  • The Market Misconduct Tribunal (MMT) sanctioned two former executives of Asia Telemedia Limited (ATML), now known as Yunfeng Financial Group Limited, for insider dealing.

 

 

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

iComplyKYC Q1 2021 Product Updates

iComplyKYC Q1 2021 Product Updates

iComplyKYC Q1 2021 Product Updates

Introducing our latest notes from iComply’s most comprehensive release yet, including the launch of iComplyKYC Developer Licenses

 

2021 has been a fruitful year thus far, with the addition of more workflow automation, enhanced security features, and several UI enhancements. Most notably, the iComplyKYC platform now includes major updates to Legal Entity onboarding and management, as well as key fixes for document jurisdiction selection and expiry dates.

 

Major Product Highlights: 

  • UPDATE: Data Match Logic Improvement
    Improvements have been made to how data points such as Name and Date of birth are extracted from client ID and compared against the personal details they have submitted. Live face matching has been enhanced to allow greater flexibility and confidence in liveness tests and biometric authentication. Randomized testing procedures, deep fake detection, and hardware security detection are run and results documented for you instantly.
  • UPDATE: Jurisdiction Section Now Populated for Passports
    Your end-users can now select their country of jurisdiction when they are asked to submit an image of their passport. This additional data point will appear on their natural person profile, viewable in your admin dashboard.
  • UPDATE: UX/UI Changes to Legal Entity Address Section
    Large organizations often operate from multiple locations, so we’ve made it easier to manage multiple legal entity addresses. The address component on Legal Entity profiles has been newly enhanced, with sortable location details for easier search and a special HQ icon to designate the entity’s headquarters. Collect addresses through client submissions, or manually add your own through the Legal Entity profile.
  • UPDATE: Legal Entity Management
    Now you can securely onboard businesses, verify their identity, addresses, and affiliated entities to better analyze for risk, control, and ultimate beneficial ownership. Legal Entity portals support workflows for onboarding, user authorization & authentication, and supporting document collection and encryption.
  • UPDATE: Request Client Update
    Invite your clients or users to your secure KYC portals where they can submit, authenticate, and encrypt their KYC data and supporting documents before it leaves their device. Say goodbye to unsecured email transfers of sensitive identity documents and personal information! Get notified with alerts of new submissions to your client’s KYC Profile and stay on top of your compliance tasks with this exciting new platform feature.
  • UPDATE: KYC Review Date
    Set calendars to automate KYC reviews and trigger KYC refreshes. Stay on top of all of your accounts so your business continues to grow.
  • FIX: Document Expiry Logic Updated
    We’ve fixed a bug that previously only allowed platform users to set the expiry date for an identification document now or in the past. We’ve also improved the clarity of the Issue that appears when a document has a date that cannot be read.
  • NEW FEATURE: Clarification Message When Entering Dates
    We live in a world with multiple date formatting options, and it can be confusing to know which format is preferred when entering a date. We’ve added text in our portal that clarifies to your end-users the Date they have entered, based on your preferred date format. This gives them the opportunity to correct it in real-time and minimize incorrect submissions.

 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

INTRODUCING: iComplyKYC Developer Licenses

Implementing a KYC, AML, or digital identity management solution need not be exhausting or expensive, yet many of our clients have shared horror stories of the high costs and lengthy processes required to set up, maintain, and use various competitors’ products.

To help companies find the right product fit before making a full commitment, we recently launched our iComply Essentials and iComply Pro Developer Licenses. For a limited trial basis, your team can test platform features, optimize workflows and automation thresholds, and customize integrations. 

Developer licenses allow you to:

  • Create, test, and manage KYC portals for Natural Person and Legal Entities
  • Request KYC data submissions or updates from clients via your secure portal
  • Integrate the iComply platform with our powerful REST API
  • Configure thresholds for auto-acceptance, confidence, and risk levels
  • Customize supporting documents, workflows, styles, and more
  • Configure AML search profiles and coverage
  • Access a limited number of KYC Services for testing

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

Learn more about our latest features, pricing, and use cases in the iComplyKYC Product Guide. For a walkthrough of our platform functionality and key features, you can book a demo or contact our sales team for more information.

 

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

March 2021 Regulatory Updates

March 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights
– March 2021

 

United States: 

 

  • The SEC charged the founder of San Francisco-based biotech company uBiome for defrauding investors out of USD $60 million with false claims of the company’s successful business model and track record.  

 

  • The SEC charged 7 individuals and tech company Airborne Wireless Network with running a fraudulent fundraising scheme that generated nearly USD $45 million.

 

  • The SEC charged private investor George Heckler for running a decade-long scheme defrauding investors of over USD $90 million through two private hedge funds.

 

  • The SEC charged Seth P. Levine, owner of real estate firm Norse Holdings, LLC, that defrauding at least 60 people out of millions based on false and misleading claims about real estate investments.

 

  • The SEC took action against California-based stock trader Andrew L. Fassari (known as @OCMillionaire on Twitter) for a $900K fraudulent Twitter scheme for a now-defunct cannabis company.

 

United Kingdom:

 

  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined over £530,000 24 Hour Trading Academy for giving unauthorized trading advice via Whatsapp to consumers.

 

  • The FCA fined experienced trader Mr. Adrian Geoffrey Horn £52,500 for executing trades with himself (“wash trading”) and prohibited him from participating in regulated activities.

 

Hong Kong:

 

  • The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong fined Yardley Securities Limited $5 million for failing to comply with AML/CFT regulatory requirements while handling third-party fund transfers.

 

  • SFC reprimanded and fined Sino-Rich Securities & Futures Limited $7.2 million for failures in complying with AML/CFT regulatory requirements when handling cash deposits and third-party fund transfers.

 

 

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

May 2021 Regulatory Updates

February 2021 Regulatory Updates

February 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights
– February 2021

 

United States

  • The U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) suspended trading in the securities of 15 companies due to questionable trading and social media activity targeted at artificially inflating their stock price.

 

  • The SEC charged an Oklahoma-based gas exploration and production company, Gulfport Energy Corporation, and its former CEO Moore, for failing to properly disclose executive perks and related person transactions.

 

  • The SEC charged three individuals with running a Ponzi-like scheme that raised over $1.7 billion from 17,000 retail investors through securities issued by a New York-based registered investment adviser GPB Capital.

 

  • FINRA fined Atlanta-based investment firm Triad Advisors $200,000 over findings that it neglected to follow proper compliance procedures when switching customers’ investments between funds.

 

  • The SEC’s initial fine of $5 million on two Ukrainian traders and their firm for defrauding investors was increased to $7.5 million in February 2021 by a U.S. Supreme Court judge.

 

  • OFAC fined BitPay, Inc., a digital currency company based in Georgia, more than $500,000 for over 2,100 international sanctions violations from multiple digital currency transactions.

 

United Kingdom:

  • FCA began criminal proceedings against two brothers, former Goldman Sachs and Clifford Chance employees, for fraud by false representation and insider trading.

 

Hong Kong:

  • The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) reprimanded Brilliance Asset Management Limited and fined it $3.15M over failures to ensure short position reports (SPRs) for four collective investment schemes.

 

  • SFC prohibited 13 brokers from dealing with assets held in 54 trading accounts related to a suspected social media ramp-and-dump scam involving the manipulation of the market

 

Regulatory Updates

Singapore:

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) recently published its Technology Risk Management Guidelines with a focus on establishing robust governance to ensure cyber resilience and sound technology risk practices for those companies operating both inside and outside of Singapore.

 

 

Upcoming Events:


The New Consumer: How to Ensure Integrity
in the Virtual Economy

 

Join our upcoming fireside event as we discuss the rise of virtual marketplaces as the new eCommerce, and how every player in these marketplaces – from consumers to payment processors – can establish a vibrant digital ecosystem built on integrity and accountability.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.