Login
Contact Sales
Login
CONTACT SALES
Implementing GDPR into Your Verification Solutions for Enhanced Data Security

Implementing GDPR into Your Verification Solutions for Enhanced Data Security

by | Nov 29, 2024 | Blog, Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

Implementing GDPR verification solutions is essential for enhancing data security and ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Effective tools and strategies for GDPR compliance help protect personal data, prevent breaches, and maintain customer trust.

Key Strategies for GDPR Compliance

1. Develop a Comprehensive GDPR Compliance Framework

Description: Establish a detailed framework that outlines policies, procedures, and responsibilities for GDPR compliance.

Steps:

  • Policy Development: Create clear policies defining the scope and objectives of GDPR compliance.
  • Procedural Guidelines: Develop guidelines for data processing, storage, and protection.
  • Compliance Team: Form a dedicated team to oversee and manage GDPR compliance activities.

Benefits:

  • Consistency: Ensures a uniform approach to GDPR compliance across the organization.
  • Accountability: Defines roles and responsibilities, promoting accountability.
  • Efficiency: Streamlines compliance processes, reducing the risk of errors and non-compliance.

2. Conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)

Description: DPIAs help identify and mitigate data protection risks in new projects or processes.

Steps:

  • Identify Risks: Assess the potential impact on data privacy and security.
  • Mitigate Risks: Implement measures to mitigate identified risks.
  • Document Findings: Maintain records of the assessment and mitigation measures.

Benefits:

  • Proactive Risk Management: Helps identify and address risks before they become issues.
  • Compliance: Ensures compliance with GDPR requirements for risk assessment.

3. Implement Data Minimization

Description: Collect only the data necessary for the specific purpose.

Steps:

  • Define Purpose: Clearly define the purpose of data collection.
  • Limit Collection: Collect only the data needed for that purpose.
  • Regular Review: Periodically review data collection practices to ensure they align with the principle of data minimization.

Benefits:

  • Security: Reduces the risk of data breaches by minimizing the amount of data collected.
  • Compliance: Aligns with GDPR’s principle of data minimization.

4. Use GDPR Verification Solutions

Description: Utilize advanced verification solutions to enhance data security and compliance.

Tools:

  • Data Encryption: Use encryption to protect data during transmission and storage.
  • Access Controls: Implement strict access controls to limit who can access personal data.
  • Audit Trails: Maintain detailed audit trails to track data access and modifications.
  • Automated Compliance Tools: Use automated tools to monitor compliance and detect potential issues.

Benefits:

  • Protection: Protects personal data from unauthorized access and breaches.
  • Efficiency: Automates compliance monitoring, reducing manual effort.
  • Accountability: Provides a clear record of data access and processing activities.

5. Conduct Regular Training

Description: Provide regular training to employees on GDPR requirements and best practices.

Steps:

  • Training Programs: Develop comprehensive training programs for employees at all levels.
  • Regular Updates: Update training materials regularly to reflect regulatory changes and emerging trends.
  • Interactive Sessions: Use interactive sessions, case studies, and simulations to enhance learning.

Benefits:

  • Knowledgeable Staff: Ensures employees are well-informed about GDPR requirements and best practices.
  • Improved Compliance: Enhances the ability to detect and report compliance issues.
  • Compliance Culture: Fosters a culture of GDPR compliance within the organization.

6. Monitor and Audit GDPR Compliance

Description: Implement monitoring and auditing mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance with GDPR requirements.

Steps:

  • Regular Audits: Conduct regular internal audits to assess compliance with GDPR policies and procedures.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Use real-time monitoring tools to detect and address compliance issues promptly.
  • Continuous Improvement: Implement feedback mechanisms to continuously improve compliance processes.

Benefits:

  • Compliance Assurance: Provides assurance that the organization meets GDPR requirements.
  • Risk Mitigation: Identifies and mitigates compliance risks proactively.
  • Operational Integrity: Enhances the overall integrity of compliance operations.

Implementing GDPR verification solutions is essential for enhancing data security and ensuring compliance. By developing a comprehensive GDPR compliance framework, conducting DPIAs, implementing data minimization, using advanced verification solutions, conducting regular training, and monitoring compliance, organizations can protect personal data, meet regulatory requirements, and build customer trust.

Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know

Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know

by | Aug 28, 2024 | AML - Anti-Money Laundering, Blog, Compliance Updates, iComply Insights, Solutions

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations are critical for financial institutions worldwide to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. This article provides an overview of global AML regulations, highlighting the key requirements and best practices to ensure compliance.

Understanding Global AML Regulations

AML regulations are laws and guidelines designed to prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activities. These regulations vary by country but share common objectives of ensuring financial institutions implement measures to detect, prevent, and report suspicious activities.

Key Global AML Regulatory Frameworks

1. Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

Description: FATF is an intergovernmental body that sets international standards for AML and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT).

Key Requirements:

  • Risk-Based Approach: Financial institutions must implement a risk-based approach to AML/CFT.
  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verify the identity of customers and assess their risk profile.
  • Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR): Report suspicious transactions to relevant authorities.
  • Record Keeping: Maintain records of transactions and customer information.

Best Practices:

  • Adopt FATF Recommendations: Ensure compliance with FATF recommendations and guidance.
  • Conduct Regular Risk Assessments: Regularly assess and update risk profiles based on changing circumstances.
  • Implement Robust Reporting Mechanisms: Develop systems for timely and accurate reporting of suspicious activities.

2. European Union (EU) AML Directives

Description: The EU has implemented several AML directives to harmonize AML regulations across member states.

Key Requirements:

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verify the identity of customers and beneficial owners.
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Apply enhanced measures for high-risk customers and transactions.
  • Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): Implement specific measures for PEPs and their associates.
  • Beneficial Ownership Registers: Maintain registers of beneficial ownership information.

Best Practices:

  • Align with EU Directives: Ensure compliance with the latest EU AML directives.
  • Use Technology for CDD: Implement digital solutions for efficient and accurate customer due diligence.
  • Monitor PEPs: Regularly update and monitor PEP lists to ensure compliance.

3. United States Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)

Description: The BSA is a key AML regulation in the United States, requiring financial institutions to implement measures to detect and report money laundering.

Key Requirements:

  • Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR): Report suspicious transactions to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
  • Currency Transaction Reporting (CTR): Report transactions involving large sums of cash.
  • Customer Identification Program (CIP): Verify the identity of customers at account opening.
  • Record Keeping: Maintain records of transactions and customer information.

Best Practices:

  • Automate Reporting: Use automated systems to detect and report suspicious activities promptly.
  • Regular Training: Provide ongoing training for employees on BSA requirements and best practices.
  • Conduct Internal Audits: Regularly audit AML compliance programs to ensure adherence to BSA regulations.

Challenges in Complying with Global AML Regulations

1. Evolving Regulatory Landscape

Challenge: Keeping up with constantly changing regulations and ensuring compliance across multiple jurisdictions.

Solution:

  • Regulatory Intelligence: Use regulatory intelligence tools to stay updated on regulatory changes.
  • Flexible Compliance Programs: Develop flexible compliance programs that can adapt to new regulations.

2. Technological Advancements

Challenge: Adapting to new technologies and integrating them into existing compliance frameworks.

Solution:

  • Continuous Innovation: Invest in new technologies and continuously innovate compliance processes.
  • Integration with Existing Systems: Ensure new technologies integrate seamlessly with existing systems.

3. Resource Constraints

Challenge: Limited resources for compliance activities, especially for smaller financial institutions.

Solution:

  • Outsourcing and Partnerships: Consider outsourcing compliance functions or partnering with RegTech providers.
  • Automation: Automate routine compliance tasks to free up resources for more strategic activities.

Understanding and complying with global AML regulations is essential for financial institutions to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. By adhering to key regulatory frameworks such as FATF, EU AML directives, and the US BSA, institutions can ensure compliance and protect their reputation. Implementing best practices, leveraging technology, and staying updated with evolving regulations will help financial institutions maintain a robust AML compliance framework and mitigate the risks associated with financial crimes.

Q3 2022 Regulatory Updates

Q3 2022 Regulatory Updates

by | Oct 12, 2022 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

Q3 2022 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights – Q3 2022

 

United States: 

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced fraud charges against Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company for providing account statements to approximately 1.4 million variable annuity investors that included materially misleading statements and omissions concerning investor fees. Their penalty is $50 million.
  • The SEC announced charges against Health Insurance Innovations (HII) and its former CEO Gavin Southwell for concealing extensive consumer complaints about short-term and limited health insurance products HII offered.
  • The SEC announced insider trading charges against Ishan Wahi, a former Coinbase product manager, his brother, and his friend for perpetrating a scheme to trade ahead of multiple announcements regarding certain crypto assets that would be made available for trading on the Coinbase platform
  • The SEC filed insider trading charges against Stephen Buyer, a former U.S. Representative for Indiana’s 4th Congressional District. According to the SEC’s complaint, Stephen Buyer formed a consulting firm, Stephen Buyer Group, which provided services to T-Mobile and other clients. In March 2018, Buyer attended a golf outing with a T-Mobile executive, from whom he learned about the company’s then nonpublic plan to acquire Sprint. Buyer began purchasing Sprint securities the next day, and, ahead of the merger announcement, he acquired a total of $568,000 of Sprint common stock in his own personal accounts, a joint account with his cousin, and an acquaintance’s account.
  • The SEC separately charged J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, UBS Financial Services Inc., and TradeStation Securities, Inc. for deficiencies in their respective programs to prevent customer identity theft, in violation of the SEC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule (Regulation S-ID).
  • The SEC charged 11 individuals for their roles in creating and promoting Forsage, a fraudulent crypto pyramid and ponzi scheme that raised more than USD $300 Million from millions of retail investors worldwide, including in the United States. Those charged include the four founders of Forsage, who were last known to be living in Russia, the Republic of Georgia, and Indonesia, as well as three U.S.-based promoters engaged by the founders to endorse Forsage on its website and social media platforms, and several members of the so-called Crypto Crusaders—the largest promotional group for the scheme that operated in the United States from at least five different states.
  • The SEC charged Global Business Development and Consulting Corp. (Global) and its owner, Anthony J. Mastroianni, Jr., in connection with a $1.2 million fraudulent promissory note scheme targeting older Americans.
  • The SEC charged Granite Construction, Incorporated and its former Senior Vice President, Dale Swanberg, with fraud for inflating the financial performance of the major subdivision Swanberg managed. In 2021, Granite restated its financial statements from 2017 through 2019 to correct revenue and profit margin errors allegedly caused by Swanberg’s misconduct.
  • The SEC announced settled charges requiring Oracle Corporation to pay more than $23 million to resolve charges that it violated provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when subsidiaries in Turkey, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and India created and used slush funds to bribe foreign officials in return for business between 2016 and 2019.

Canada:

  • The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) announced that it has fined Cheetah Consulting Ltd. This money services business in Richmond, British Columbia, was imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CAD $33,000 on July 20, 2022, for non-compliance with Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and its associated Regulations.
  • FINTRAC announced that it has fined Nu Stream Realty Inc. The real estate broker in Burnaby, B.C., received an administrative monetary penalty of CAD $230,423 for non-compliance with Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and its associated Regulations.

United Kingdom:

  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced fines of £12.6M against Citigroup’s international broker-dealer for failing to properly implement the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) trade surveillance requirements relating to the detection of market abuse.
  • The FCA has fined The TJM Partnership Limited (in liquidation) £2,038,700 for failing to ensure it had effective systems and controls in place to identify and reduce the risk of financial crime and money laundering in its business operations.

Germany:

  • The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin announced that it imposed a securities violation fine of €200,000 on MFS Meridian Funds for failing to submit voting rights notifications within the prescribed period.

Singapore:

  • The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has imposed fines of $375,000 on UOB Kay Hian Private Limited for business conduct and AML/CFT failures.

Hong Kong:

  • The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has reprimanded and fined TC Capital International Limited for HK$3 Million and suspended its responsible officer for failing to discharge its duties as the sponsor in the listing application of China Candy Holdings Limited (China Candy). The disciplinary action followed the SFC’s investigation which found that TC Capital failed to:
    • 1) conduct reasonable due diligence on the third party payments made on behalf of two top customers of China Candy; and
    • 2) maintain proper records of the due diligence work allegedly done in relation to the listing application.
  • The SFC reprimanded KTF Capital Management Limited (KTFCM)—formerly known as Forchn International Asset Management Co. Limited and Rega Technologies Limited—and handed out a HK$400,000 fine for breaching Financial Resources rules. The SFC found that KTFCM failed to maintain its required liquid capital of approximately HK$2.8 million between 13 and 18 December 2018 and failed to notify the SFC when it became aware of its inability to comply with the financial resources requirements. It transpired that the almost HK$20 million deficit in KTFCM’s liquid capital was the result of an oversight in that it failed to anticipate its proprietary trading in shares would trigger adverse implications to its liquid capital calculation.
  • The SFC has reprimanded Rifa Futures Limited (Rifa) HK$9 Million for failure to comply with Know-Your-Client, Anti-Money Laundering / Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT), and other regulatory requirements between May 2016 and Oct 2018.
  • The SFC has reprimanded RBC Investment Services (Asia) Limited (RBC) and fined it HK$7.7 Million for regulatory breaches relating to mishandling of client assets.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Sanctions Update: Russia, Ukraine, and Global Uncertainty

Sanctions Update: Russia, Ukraine, and Global Uncertainty

by | Mar 14, 2022 | Blog, Compliance Updates, Events

Sanctions Update: Russia, Ukraine, and Global Uncertainty

The Update: What Happened?

Uncertain relations between Ukraine and Russia continue to affect many countries engaging in trade including Canada, the United States, the European Union, China, Iran, and Russia. Effective DATE, sanctions have been imposed and will continue by the largest countries doing trade with Russia; most significantly, the United States. 

 

The Background: SWIFT Access Sanction – Russia’s Main Banking System

On February 26th, a call to action was imposed by the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, the UK and the US to remove specific banks from the SWIFT (system that facilitates financial transactions and money transfers for banks located around the world) messaging platform. The agreement was imposed to break down Russia’s financial system, a method to further hamper the invasion in Ukraine. Additionally, any other banks will be affected as a German government source reported.

 

The Solution: How iComply Can Help

iComply Investor Services Inc. (“iComply”) is a global compliance software provider that helps compliance teams reduce the cost and complexity of KYC and AML operations while providing a seamless user experience to their KYC subjects. Compliance teams can configure and monitor KYC portals to securely gather, validate, and encrypt client data and documentation before it leaves their device

Our iComplyKYC solution enables access to the most up-to-date client data available and gain a more comprehensive view of risk related to each entity. It also uses AI and deep data analysis to identify new risks and sanctions within 17 minutes, enables management to visualize the volumes and bottlenecks in KYC and AML operations, and it reduces the operational cost of AML risk screening, record keeping, and reporting.

 

How can iComplyKYC screening help you enhance your sanctions compliance? 

Our solution’s capabilities onboard natural persons, beneficial ownership,  and legal entities data, saving your organization time and valuable resources. By using iComply’s platform, you can easily scan sanctioned banks listed by regulatory authorities.

 

Why is this important to my business/organization?

iComply is working with its clients to ensure they have their bases covered from an AML/KYC compliance perspective.

  • Improve screening accuracy while minimizing false positives
  • Stay on top of ever-evolving financial crime activity
  • Ensures GDPR compliance so your organization does not risk being imposed with hefty financial penalties from regulators
  • Do all your compliance checks and due diligence for you rather than using your own human resources or having to contract with multiple vendors 

Q3 2022 Regulatory Updates

October 2021 Regulatory Updates

by | Nov 8, 2021 | Compliance Updates, iComply Insights

October 2021 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe


Enforcement Highlights – October 2021

 

United States: 

 

  • The SEC charged CanaFarma Hemp Products Corp. and co-founders with defrauding investors of nearly USD $15 million and misappropriating a majority of investor funds for personal use and unrelated purposes.

 

  • The SEC charged former broker and investment adviser Kenneth A. Welsh with misappropriating almost USD $3 million from his clients’ accounts in order to personally purchase gold coins and other precious metals.

 

  • The SEC announced that clearing agency Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) will pay USD $8 million in penalties to settle charges that it failed to enact adequate risk management policies within its Government Securities Division.

 

  • Credit Suisse Group AG has agreed to pay hundreds of millions in penalties, including nearly USD $100 million to the SEC, for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and misleading investors in a fraudulent loan scheme in Mozambique. 

 

United Kingdom:

 

  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) also fined Credit Suisse over £147 million for significant failure to conduct adequate due diligence regarding loans worth over $1.3 billion, which the bank arranged for the Republic of Mozambique.

 

Hong Kong:

 

  • The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) fined Ample Capital Limited $5.5 million and suspends its responsible officer for IPO sponsor failures.

 


Regulatory Updates

 

FATF: Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers

This latest update forms part of the FATF’s ongoing monitoring of the virtual assets and VASP sector and provides relevant examples and potential solutions to implementation obstacles. The 2021 Guidance includes updates focusing on updates and additional information in the following six key areas: 

  • Clarification of the definitions of virtual assets and VASPs
  • How the FATF Standards apply to stablecoins
  • Related risks and tools available to countries to address money laundering and terrorist financing risks for peer-to-peer transactions
  • Licensing and registration of VASPs
  • Public and private sector guidance on the implementation of the “travel rule”
  • Principles of information-sharing and co-operation amongst VASP Supervisors

 

Access It Here

 

FinCEN: Updated Suspicious Activity Reports Statistics

The Department of the Treasury and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) recently released updated statistics on the SARs submitted up to the end of September 2021, showcasing an anticipated record high of over 3,000,000 SARs filed by the end of the year. 

The challenge now facing enforcement agencies is to sift through the high volumes of reports to determine quality vs quantity. The AML Act of 2020 has been the biggest proponent of improvement in the quality of meaningful feedback and trends, with the purpose of encouraging higher-quality reporting, not simply higher quantity.

 

Read More

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.