Fireside Chat: Navigating the Complexities of Beneficial Ownership

Fireside Chat: Navigating the Complexities of Beneficial Ownership

Fireside Chat: Navigating the Complexities of Beneficial Ownership

Date: Thursday, November 26, 2020 | 10am PST – 1pm EST – 7pm CET

 

Customer due diligence on the ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) of a legal entity is a complex and time-consuming process.

Definitions of a UBO varying greatly across jurisdictions, opaque company structures, and the lack of verifiable entity ownership data from trusted sources—all these factors create significant challenges for compliance teams, especially when transacting with corporations across several countries.

Join our live November fireside chat, “Navigating the Complexities of Beneficial Ownership: The Challenges of UBO Due Diligence“, as we host industry thought leaders and experts to discuss: 

  • The process of gathering, evaluating, and validating data from UBOs against trusted sources
  • Differentiating between % of ownership and % of control
  • Challenges of international UBO identification
  • Best practices in customer due diligence for remote, non-face-to-face transactions

 

We welcome you to join us for this free Fireside Chat on November 26th at 10am PST / 1pm EST featuring a live panel of trusted experts from around the globe. 

GUEST PANELISTS

Gene DiMira | Chief Identity Officer, The AML Shop

As one of Canada’s leading voices in the anti-money laundering industry and digital identification space, Gene has designed, implemented, and sustained AML/ATF programs digital identity programs both nationally and internationally. His background in systems, operations, and compliance controls spans financial planning firms offering securities, banking, and insurance products. His compliance focus progressed with Manulife, where he most recently served as the Head of Global Compliance AMLATF program. He currently volunteers with several organizations such as the DIACC Outreach Expert Committee, ACAMS International Sanctions Task Force, and the International Institute of Finance’s Digital Trust Initiative. 

 

Dimitrij Gede | Founder, Anagram Compliance

Dimitrij has held specialized roles within the Luxembourg banking sector which have given him a robust perspective on the vital nature that regulation plays within traditional and decentralized markets. Dimitrij has extensive experience in compliance monitoring programs, screening and AML/KYC procedures, and client onboarding while keeping abreast of regulatory changes and identifying potential exposures to organizations. Adept in project management and problem resolution, he led the creation and management of a KYC department for a major German bank and liaised with several international partners to ensure that the bank’s KYC procedures enabled smooth client onboarding.

 

Matthew Unger | Founder & CEO, iComply

Matthew Unger is the founder and CEO of iComply. After exiting a successful wealth management firm at 26, Matthew has become a recognized thought leader in fintech and regulation with over a decade of experience in advisory and technical positions in Canadian financial technology. Matthew has studied blockchain, AI, and Business Strategy at MIT. He is an active member of DIACC, Surfrider Foundation, and is an internationally recognized public speaker on fintech regulation and compliance. As an author, Matthew has been published in The Economist, Forbes, and Finance Magnates.

About iComply
iComply Investor Services Inc. (“iComply”) is a Regtech company that provides fully-digital KYC and AML compliance solutions for non-face-to-face financial and legal interactions. iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience. By partnering with multinational technology vendors such as Microsoft, DocuSign, Thomson Reuters and Refinitiv, iComply is bringing compliance teams into the digital age. Learn more: www.icomplyis.com

 

AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices
AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) technology is revolutionizing compliance practices in financial institutions. Advanced tools and technologies enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AML efforts, helping organizations detect, prevent,...

Risk Management Strategies for AML Compliance
Risk Management Strategies for AML Compliance

Effective risk management is essential for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance. Financial institutions must identify, assess, and mitigate AML risks to prevent money laundering and ensure regulatory compliance. This article...

Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know
Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations are critical for financial institutions worldwide to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. This article provides an overview of global AML regulations, highlighting the key requirements and best practices to...

September 2020 Regulatory Updates

September 2020 Regulatory Updates

September 2020 Regulatory Updates

Regulatory Actions and Updates from Around the Globe

Regulatory Updates – September 2020

 

Switzerland:

The Swiss Parliament approved new distributed ledger technology (DLT) regulations, introducing a new license category for digital asset exchanges, a new type of digital securities, and an updated framework for custody providers. Most notably, the new regulation is expected to pave the way for blockchains to be applied to the function of the central securities register.

MME, a prominent legal and accounting firm in Switzerland, recently published this detailed analysis of the new Swiss DLT regulation.

European Union:

The European Commission unveiled its much anticipated legislative package titled the Digital Finance Package. The package aims to increase the competitiveness and innovation within the EU financial markets and covers digital finance, payments, virtual assets, cyber-security, and digital resilience.

Hong Kong:

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority published new onboarding requirements for corporate customers, highlighting the possibilities of remote identity verification.

While the onboarding of natural persons has become commonplace in most major financial centers, an onboarding process for legal entities requires additional layers of assurance to complete:

  • verification of the legal entity’s identity;
  • identity verification of corporate representative(s);
  • confirm corporate representative(s) have related authorizations;
  • identification of current beneficial owner(s);
  • identity verification on beneficial owner(s); and
  • understanding the ownership, control, and business nature of the legal entity.

When it comes to customer due diligence for legal entities, the regulator considers these steps to be essential for any basic know your customer process. However, because corporations often have complex structures, enhanced due diligence is often required when onboarding a corporation or other legal entity. 

While there is still a lot of room for innovation, iComply’s leadership in this area has contributed to the development of international and open source standards for how to digitally onboard a legal entity. Book a live demo of iComplyKYC to learn more.

Global:

The Financial Action Task Force (The FATF) issued new guidance, “Virtual Assets – Red Flag Indicators of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing.” The report aims to help virtual asset service providers (VASPs), financial service providers, and non-financial businesses to better detect and report suspicious transactions.

The FATF outlines the following events to be key indicators of potentially criminal activity:

  • Anonymization: peer-to-peer exchanges websites, mixing or tumbling services or anonymity-enhanced cryptocurrencies
  • Geographic risk: where criminals may “shop jurisdictions” to exploit countries with weak, or non-existent, measures for virtual assets
  • Transaction patterns: irregular, unusual, or uncommon account or wallet activity 
  • Transaction size: where the amount and/or frequency has no apparent business explanation
  • Sender or recipient profiles: unusual account behavior
  • Source of funds or wealth: which can relate to criminal activity

The report is expected to provide clarity for the finance sector, financial intelligence units, law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and regulators to better understand when a virtual asset transaction may require enhanced due diligence, monitoring, or suspicious activity reporting.

United States:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published a “no action” letter outlining the role of an alternative trading system (ATS) in the nascent digital securities industry.

The letter provides clarity from the regulator on how digital securities transactions can be performed using either a four-step non-custodial process or a new three-step process using custodians. The letter outlines both processes in detail and signals how the SEC is preparing for digital securities to be used widely throughout the financial sector—with or without the need for a custodian.

 

Expert Insights

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

Sept 16, 2020 | In the recent Expert Insight, Jonathan C. Dunsmoor of Dunsmoor Law, P.C. reviews the impact of the revised FATF standards on the virtual asset industry.

 

Enforcement Highlights

Hong Kong: SFC fined The Bank of East Asia $4.2 million for failing to ensure compliance according to relevant regulatory requirements.

United Kingdom: FCA published a warning regarding a “clone firm” that scams customers by pretending to be an FCA-authorized firm and advice on protecting yourself from similar fraud schemes.

United States: SEC charged 5 individuals including a famous film producer for promoting two fraudulent ICOs, FLiK and CoinSpark.

United States: eSports gaming platform Unikrn settled unregistered ICO charges with SEC by paying a $6.1 million penalty back to harmed investors.

United States: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Russian nationals for involvement in a cryptocurrency phishing campaign, blocking all of their all property and interests in property in the country.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring
Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) monitoring is crucial for detecting and preventing financial crimes in real-time. Edge computing plays a vital role in enhancing real-time AML monitoring by providing improved data processing speed,...

How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification
How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification

Know Your Business (KYB) verification is essential for financial institutions to assess the legitimacy and risk profiles of business clients. Edge computing offers significant advantages in enhancing KYB verification by providing...

Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance
Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is critical for financial institutions to verify the identities of their customers, mitigate risks, and adhere to regulatory requirements. Leveraging edge computing can significantly enhance...

FCA Research Reveals 1.1 Million Spike in Cryptoasset Buyers

FCA Research Reveals 1.1 Million Spike in Cryptoasset Buyers

FCA Research Reveals 1.1 Million Spike in Cryptoasset Buyers

Denisse Rudich reviews the FCA’s recent findings on the growth of the cryptoassets industry in the UK and potential regulatory changes

What happened​?

The FCA issued its findings of a quantitative study carried out to get a better understanding of the cryptoassets market and user behavior in the UK. The research looked into areas of potential harm as well as general attitudes towards cryptoassets. A key finding is that over 2.6 million people or companies in the UK have purchased cryptoassets.

What types of stakeholders will be impacted by this?

The research will be of interest to pretty much everyone in the cryptoassets ecosystem: from regulators to exchanges to financial institutions looking to offer custody services in the UK and abroad.

Why does this matter?

The study offers several significant insights into a market that has seen some controversy, particularly around fraud. As virtual assets service providers become regulated, it is important to gauge how both the market and consumer understanding of cryptoassets will continue to expand.

For example, the study found that “the majority of cryptoasset owners are generally knowledgeable about the product, are aware of the lack of regulatory protection afforded, and understand the risk of price volatility.” However, “an estimated 300,000 cryptoasset owners believe they have protection which leaves them at potential risk of financial harm.”

This makes the case that there needs to be better communication around the pitfalls of investing in cryptoassets, similar to other types of investments and asset classes.

Does this update/change create new opportunities? If so, what might they be?

Absolutely. Any time you gain new insights into a market, there is the opportunity for regulators to redefine their areas of focus for regulation, as well as their messaging towards target demographics. In a similar manner, crypto exchanges can gain an understanding of regulatory concerns but also themselves look at where to put their resources.

The FCA also highlighted that:
Cryptoassets present risks and opportunities for consumers and we hope that these insights will inform the policy debate and internationally as the use of these assets continues to grow.

Does this change create new risks for industry stakeholders? If so, what should they be looking out for?

One of the key findings is that 83% of cryptoassets purchases are carried out through non-UK exchanges. This is telling and could create regulatory arbitrage and a challenge for cryptoasset providers who have to comply with stringent anti-money laundering laws vs. those based in overseas jurisdictions who do not.

This could lead to the UK widening the net on what it regulates (i.e. those advertising in the UK or with UK clients on their books). The devil, of course, is in the details and along the lines of how do you regulate the internet? There are some lessons to be learned from the Gambling Commission on how they treat overseas entities with UK customers.

How does this impact compliance teams, and what can they do to stay ahead of the regulatory requirements?

Studies like these support businesses in their horizon planning, seeing what is looming in the distance. Compliance teams need to be aware of the ever-evolving regulation, not only in the UK but also in Europe. With countries such as the U.S. issuing crypto-related sanctions and the UN warning against North Korea’s use of crypto to evade sanctions, compliance teams must also look to maintain their sanctions screening systems up to date as well as ensure that they are signed up to regulatory intelligence sources.

The FCA stated that they are working with the UK Cryptoassets Taskforce to “understand and address the harms from cryptoassets whilst encouraging innovation in the interests of consumers.” This essentially means that they are likely to issue more guidance and decisions that will force cryptoassets providers to act quickly and possibly stop outgoing transfers or products and maybe even remove certain client types.

What can management teams or boards of directors do to stay ahead of these changes?

Management teams and boards should make sure that their compliance teams are adequately resourced so that they are able to quickly act on any information that may affect the business. changes.

For example, on 6 October 2020, the FCA published a final rule banning the sale of derivatives and exchange-traded notes to retail consumers. You can tell that this decision was informed by the survey, as the FCA clearly states:

The FCA considers these products to be ill-suited for retail consumers due to the harm they pose. These products cannot be reliably valued by retail consumers because of the:

  • inherent nature of the underlying assets, which means they have no reliable basis for valuation
  • prevalence of market abuse and financial crime in the secondary market (eg cyber theft)
  • extreme volatility in cryptoasset price movements
  • inadequate understanding of cryptoassets by retail consumers
  • lack of legitimate investment need for retail consumers to invest in these products

This essentially means that exchanges and providers must immediately cease to offer these products in the UK or to UK consumers.

What can service providers do to help their clients stay ahead of these changes?

Providing clients with intelligence and analysis to support their clients in staying ahead of the game is key. Making sure that the services that they are offering are understandable, clearly sourced, and agile can make the difference to a client’s ability to navigate the rapids that come with regulatory action.

Author — DENISSE RUDICH

Denisse Rudich has over 15 years of delivering financial crime prevention, anti-money laundering, and counter-terrorist financing systems & controls across banking and public sectors, including as Head of AML/CFT Policy for RBS (CBD) and Strategic Advisor to Rabobank. She has experience working with many top-tier financial institutions as well as holding the roles of Director of the G7 and G20 Research Groups (London) and as Secretariat for the WEF’s Global Coalition to Fight Financial Crime. Denisse set up the first global AML/CFT working group for the crypto industry and acts as a Senior Advisor to RegTech, FinTech, crypto/virtual assets firms, and The Sentry. She most recently acted as a technical expert on the Joint Working Group of InteVASPs Messaging Standards that issued the IVMS-101 Messaging Standard and was a member of the RegTech Council. Denisse is an author, trainer, speaker, and panelist at industry events and mentors multiple startups.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring
Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) monitoring is crucial for detecting and preventing financial crimes in real-time. Edge computing plays a vital role in enhancing real-time AML monitoring by providing improved data processing speed,...

How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification
How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification

Know Your Business (KYB) verification is essential for financial institutions to assess the legitimacy and risk profiles of business clients. Edge computing offers significant advantages in enhancing KYB verification by providing...

Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance
Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is critical for financial institutions to verify the identities of their customers, mitigate risks, and adhere to regulatory requirements. Leveraging edge computing can significantly enhance...

Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification – How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification – How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Fireside Chat: From Nomination to Verification—How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation

Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 | 10am PST – 1pm EST – 7pm CET

 

Seamless onboarding is critical to building trust with new clients, providing the foundation of a solid relationship. But in a digital-first world, clients expect non-face-to-face meetings for their health and well-being.

Corporate KYC, also known as Know-Your-Business (KYB), has become a critical process in determining high-risk corporate clients and learning where organizations can take steps to mitigate any potential fraud or illicit activity from impacting their bottom line.

From receiving company documents to verifying ultimate beneficial owners, how can you be sure that your screening and onboarding processes are properly screening for all risk factors while continuing to build a relationship of trust with your corporate clients?

Join “From Nomination to Verification: How to Digitally Onboard a Corporation“, our live fireside chat with industry experts and thought leaders to discuss:

  • How to better identify risk factors when onboarding your corporate clients
  • What regulators require from you when verifying corporate entities 
  • How to choose the right vendor partners for onboarding and screening
  • How technology is changing the game for compliance teams in a contactless world

Join us for this free Fireside Chat on October 22nd at 10am PST / 1pm EST featuring a live panel of trusted experts from around the globe. 

GUEST PANELISTS

Chris Gschwend | Senior Compliance Advisor, MME

Chris Gschwend advises corporate clients in the areas of anti-money laundering, trade controls, sanctions, and customs management. She specializes in the implementation of FinTech and traditional compliance programs and has over 10 years of experience in managing global compliance teams in the aerospace and manufacturing industries. Chris Gschwend also brings public sector experience, having developed trade policies and negotiated free trade agreements for Canada Customs (CBSA).

Amber Scott | Founder & CEO, Outlier Compliance Group

Amber has broad-based financial compliance experience that includes insurance, mutual funds, and banking. In addition to being a Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), Amber is also a Certified Privacy Professional (CIPP). She also holds a mutual fund sales designation from the Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) and a first level Fellow, Life Management Institute (FLMI).

Gueorgui Gotzev | International Counsel, Kohler Gotzev

Gueorgui has a broad academic and operational experience in capital markets, bank & finance, alternative investment funds, distributed ledger technology (DLT), and Virtual Asset Services Providers (VASPs). He helps restructure, digitalized, optimize, and outsource any part of a fund’s investment management and central administration burdens. He loves consulting on process optimization and investor onboarding automation, KYC, AML/CFT, and CRS/FATCA compliance. Gueorgui holds an LL.M. in International Financial Law from the University of Paris 1 – Panthéon Sorbonne and has completed a full qualification course in Luxembourg law (CCDL) from the University of Luxembourg.

About iComply
iComply Investor Services Inc. (“iComply”) is a Regtech company that provides fully-digital KYC and AML compliance solutions for non-face-to-face financial and legal interactions. iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience. By partnering with multinational technology vendors such as Microsoft, DocuSign, Thomson Reuters and Refinitiv, iComply is bringing compliance teams into the digital age. Learn more: www.icomplyis.com

 

AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices
AML Technology: Transforming Compliance Practices

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) technology is revolutionizing compliance practices in financial institutions. Advanced tools and technologies enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AML efforts, helping organizations detect, prevent,...

Risk Management Strategies for AML Compliance
Risk Management Strategies for AML Compliance

Effective risk management is essential for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance. Financial institutions must identify, assess, and mitigate AML risks to prevent money laundering and ensure regulatory compliance. This article...

Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know
Global AML Regulations: What You Need to Know

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations are critical for financial institutions worldwide to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. This article provides an overview of global AML regulations, highlighting the key requirements and best practices to...

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards – Virtual Assets and VASPs

Jonathan C. Dunsmoor of Dunsmoor Law, P.C. discusses the impact of the 12-month review of the revised FAFT standards on the virtual asset industry

What happened​?

Overall, both the public and private sectors have made progress by implementing the newly revised FATF Standards, where 35 out of 54 jurisdictions are implementing FATF Standards. Even though there are still issues that need to be addressed, there has been no clear indication of a need to make amendments to the FATF Standards as of yet. This may change dramatically in the coming months, given the recent rise of Decentralized Exchanges (“DEX”) such as Uniswap.

What types of stakeholders will be impacted by this?

Anyone involved with the transmission of virtual currency needs to be aware of the FATF Standards and the applicability both locally and globally to their business operations. This is true regardless of whether the business is in the traditional money services business or in the virtual assets industry.

Why does this matter?

The reason for working diligently to maintain and improve upon these standards is simply to facilitate larger, more compliant business protocols globally. If the proliferation of terrorist financing and/or money laundering can be reduced, then the facilitation of greater access to investment opportunities can arise where transmission standards are respected and maintained.

Does this update/change create new opportunities? If so, what might they be?

Yes, the changes in the implementation and constant movement in technology regarding virtual assets will provide opportunities for further development of risk assessment departments in businesses, and the training and implementation of new technology tools will create a need for experts in these technologies and related industries. This is especially true for new asset classes and key threshold signature wallets.

Does this change create new risks for industry stakeholders? If so, what should they be looking out for?

No, these changes do not create new risks; however, changes in how virtual assets and VASPs are being used do create unknown risks that either have not been identified or lack the option for prevention due to the revised FATF Standards not being implemented within their jurisdiction. If a business engages with virtual assets and/or VASPs, it must be compliant with the law.

How does this impact compliance teams, and what can they do to stay ahead of the regulatory requirements?

There will be a wider need for deeper understanding in terms of the revised FATF Standards, as well as an understanding of the risks associated with virtual assets and VASPs. With the
changes in technology implemented by these avenues, it creates a demand for knowledge on tools and techniques to either prohibit or hinder the use of VASPs. The key will be staying abreast of new knowledge, sharing information, and implementing techniques that have been suggested by other members.

What can management teams or boards of directors do to stay ahead of these changes?

As mentioned, staying abreast of new knowledge presented in regards to the revised FATF Standards, sharing information among teams and the board, and making sure the Board of Directors is doing their due diligence in gaining information from other businesses that are using VASPs.

What can service providers do to help their clients stay ahead of these changes?

Service providers can start by implementing preventative measures under the FATF Standards. It’s important to have an idea of the client…that way, a service provider can perform their due diligence in reporting suspicious activity, screening for compliance issues, and keeping detailed records of their clients’ activities. It is highly recommended that internal protocols be developed and followed, especially for VASPs. This includes cross-border transactions as well as adherence to local laws regarding money transmission.

 

This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please seek competent legal counsel for specific questions or concerns regarding FATF or any topics discussed herein.

Author — JONATHAN C. DUNSMOOR

Jonathan C. Dunsmoor, Esq. is a U.S. corporate attorney who focuses his practice on securities law and regulatory matters, including compliance protocols for blockchain-related offerings, asset management, and corporate governance. He represents private companies wishing to raise funds, including those exploring blockchain/cryptocurrency opportunities, as well as angel investors and investment funds. Jonathan is Senior Of Counsel for the New York-based Reid & Wise, LLC with offices in San Francisco and Shanghai.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring
Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) monitoring is crucial for detecting and preventing financial crimes in real-time. Edge computing plays a vital role in enhancing real-time AML monitoring by providing improved data processing speed,...

How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification
How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification

Know Your Business (KYB) verification is essential for financial institutions to assess the legitimacy and risk profiles of business clients. Edge computing offers significant advantages in enhancing KYB verification by providing...

Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance
Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is critical for financial institutions to verify the identities of their customers, mitigate risks, and adhere to regulatory requirements. Leveraging edge computing can significantly enhance...

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions

Kayvan B. Sadeghi of Schiff Hardin LLP reviews recent actions from both the SEC and CFTC against app developer Abra

What happened​?

On July 13, 2020, the SEC and CFTC each filed settled enforcement actions against Abra and its related company, Plutus Technologies Philippines Corporation.

Abra is a cryptocurrency app developer that offered synthetic exposure to dozens of fiat currencies, digital currencies, and blue-chip stocks and ETFs. They were penalized for structuring and effecting swaps without complying with U.S. securities and commodities laws.

Abra unsuccessfully sought to avoid U.S. laws by excluding U.S. purchasers and moving certain operations out of the U.S. The SEC announcement emphasizes that one “may not evade the federal securities laws merely by transacting primarily with non-U.S. retail investors and setting up a foreign entity to act as a counterparty, while conducting crucial parts of their business in the United States.”

What types of stakeholders will be impacted by this?

This announcement should serve as a caution to anyone seeking to structure their business conduct or offerings to stay outside the reach of U.S. securities and commodities laws.

Why does this matter?

U.S. regulators view the reach of U.S. laws far more broadly than businesses might expect. This action also demonstrates the clear intent of the SEC and CFTC to work together where their jurisdictions may overlap, including in the blockchain space.

Does this change create new risks for industry stakeholders? If so, what should they be looking out for?

This action highlights and increases the regulatory risks for anyone who has sought to stay outside the reach of U.S. laws by excluding U.S. purchasers. The SEC and CFTC likely will now view the market as on notice that the efforts taken by Abra were insufficient.

Does this change create new opportunities for industry stakeholders? If so, what might they be?

Any company that has concerns about compliance with U.S. securities and commodities laws should consider this announcement an opportunity to evaluate with counsel whether to approach the SEC and/or CFTC proactively.

How does this impact compliance teams, and what can they do to stay ahead of the regulatory requirements?

Compliance teams must remain vigilant with KYC and AML requirements, but they must also realize that a well-intentioned and implemented plan to exclude U.S. purchasers is only part of the puzzle, not a complete solution.

What can management teams or boards of directors do to stay ahead of these changes?

Management teams and boards can evaluate with outside counsel both their existing compliance programs and whether to proactively engage regulators through channels such as LabCFTC and SEC’s FinHub.

What can service providers do to help their clients stay ahead of these changes?

Service providers will do well to stay in their lane, understand what risks they can help control, and also where their best efforts alone may fall short of reaching their client’s end goal.

Author — KAYVAN B. SADEGHI

Kayvan B. Sadeghi is a trial and appellate lawyer at Schiff Hardin LLP with more than 15 years of experience in complex commercial and securities litigation, investigations, and enforcement proceedings. He regularly defends clients before the U.S. Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, state attorneys general, and other government agencies. His clients have included leading global companies, and their directors and officers, across a range of industries including financial services, media, technology, and energy.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring
Edge Computing and Real-Time AML Monitoring

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) monitoring is crucial for detecting and preventing financial crimes in real-time. Edge computing plays a vital role in enhancing real-time AML monitoring by providing improved data processing speed,...

How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification
How Edge Computing Enhances KYB Verification

Know Your Business (KYB) verification is essential for financial institutions to assess the legitimacy and risk profiles of business clients. Edge computing offers significant advantages in enhancing KYB verification by providing...

Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance
Leveraging Edge Computing for Enhanced KYC Compliance

Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance is critical for financial institutions to verify the identities of their customers, mitigate risks, and adhere to regulatory requirements. Leveraging edge computing can significantly enhance...

Vaidyanathan Chandrashekhar

Vaidyanathan Chandrashekhar

Advisors

“Chandy,” is a technology and risk expert with executive experience at Boston Consulting Group, Citi, and PwC. With over two decades in financial services, digital transformation, and enterprise risk, he advises iComply on scalable compliance infrastructure for global markets.
Thomas Linder

Thomas Linder

Advisors

Thomas is a global tax and compliance expert with deep specialization in digital assets, blockchain, and tokenization. As a partner at MME Legal | Tax | Compliance, he advises iComply on regulatory strategy, cross-border compliance, and digital finance innovation.
Thomas Hardjono

Thomas Hardjono

Advisors

Thomas is a renowned identity and cybersecurity expert, serving as CTO of Connection Science at MIT. With deep expertise in decentralized identity, zero trust, and secure data exchange, he advises iComply on cutting-edge technology and privacy-first compliance architecture.
Rodney Dobson

Rodney Dobson

Advisors

Rodney is the former President of ADP Canada and international executive with over two decades of leadership in global HR and enterprise technology. He advises iComply with deep expertise in international service delivery, M&A, and scaling high-growth operations across regulated markets.
Praveen Mandal

Praveen Mandal

Advisors

Praveen is a serial entrepreneur and technology innovator, known for leadership roles at Lucent Bell Labs, ChargePoint, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator. He advises iComply on advanced computing, scalable infrastructure, and the intersection of AI, energy, and compliance tech.
Paul Childerhose

Paul Childerhose

Advisors

Paul is a Canadian RegTech leader and founder of Maple Peak Group, with extensive experience in financial services compliance, AML, and digital transformation. He advises iComply on regulatory alignment, operational strategy, and scaling compliance programs in complex markets.
John Engle

John Engle

Advisors

John is a seasoned business executive with senior leadership experience at CIBC, UBS, and Accenture. With deep expertise in investment banking, private equity, and digital transformation, he advises iComply on strategic growth, partnerships, and global market expansion.
Jeff Bandman

Jeff Bandman

Advisors

Jeff is a former CFTC official and globally recognized expert in financial regulation, fintech, and digital assets. As founder of Bandman Advisors, he brings deep insight into regulatory policy, market infrastructure, and innovation to guide iComply’s global compliance strategy.
Greg Pearlman

Greg Pearlman

Advisors

Greg is a seasoned investment banker with over 35 years of experience, including leadership roles at BMO Capital Markets, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup. Greg brings deep expertise in financial strategy and growth to support iComply's expansion in the RegTech sector.
Deven Sharma

Deven Sharma

Advisors

Deven is the former President of S&P and a globally respected authority in risk, data, and capital markets. With decades of leadership across financial services and tech, he advises iComply on strategic growth, governance, and the future of trusted data in AML compliance.