iComply Releases OFAC Screening For 6 Major Cryptocurrencies

iComply Releases OFAC Screening For 6 Major Cryptocurrencies

iComply Offers OFAC Screening for Sanctioned Bitcoin and Crypto Addresses

On November 28, 2018, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added its first bitcoin addresses to its public list of sanctioned individuals and entities. iComply is capable of screening these addresses to ensure compliance for decentralized finance and assets

Vancouver, B.C. – November 29, 2018 – iComply Investor Services (“iComply”), a leading RegTech platform for global digital finance and cryptocurrencies offers comprehensive blockchain forensic screening to address risks related to blockchain addresses, including sanctions screening, fraud, theft, and cyber-security.

On November 28, 2018, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added multiple Iranians and their bitcoin addresses to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN List) for laundering the bitcoin proceeds from the infamous SamSam ransomware scheme. This is the first instance of OFAC adding a cryptocurrency address to their public list of sanctioned individuals and entities.

“Agencies such as OFAC protect the integrity of financial markets, warning companies about individuals or companies that may pose a risk to their business. We developed our RegTech software, iComply, to make it possible to screen for these kinds of threats in both centralized and decentralized finance to address the unique risks when financial assets are traded using public blockchains. Currently, our solution supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Litecoin, Dash and Bitcoin Cash,” said Qayyum Rajan, Chief Data Officer, of iComply Investor Services Inc.

iComply’s solution addresses risks related to blockchain addresses and the trading of financial assets using public blockchains, this is an integral process that is complementary to traditional AML/KYC for fiat. Institutions can query addresses to achieve financial grade compliance around the individuals and entities that it transacts with.

“As blockchain is increasingly used for mainstream finance, it is integral to enforce regulatory compliance not just for the individual and entity but also for the transactions themselves,’ added Rajan. “While there has been a lot of talk about the Howey test to determine whether a token is subject to securities laws, institutions such as OFAC are now also enforcing criminal liabilities once these assets are trading.”

-##-

Looking for financial grade KYC and AML in an enterprise ready API?

iComply offers global screening for humans, corporations, and blockchain transactions in a single REST API.

Book a demo with one of our specialists to learn more.

About iComply Investor Services Inc.
iComply Investor Services Inc. (iComply) is an award-winning software company focused on reducing regulatory friction in the capital markets. With powerful data, verification, tokenization solutions, iComply helps companies overcome the cost and complexity of multi-jurisdictional compliance to effectively access new markets. Learn more: iComplyIS.com

Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement
Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement

With the world of financial crime constantly shifting and evolving, navigating illicit activities has become increasingly complex. Two prominent crimes within the financial sector are money laundering and embezzling, and while both do pose significant risk to...

U.S. Justice Department Uses Blockchain Forensics In 13-Year Jail Sentence

U.S. Justice Department Uses Blockchain Forensics In 13-Year Jail Sentence

U.S. Justice Department Uses Blockchain Forensics In 13-Year Jail Sentence

A woman in New York was sentenced for funding ISIS through a virtual asset payment processor.

What Happened?

November 26, 2018: Zoobia Shahnaz, from Long Island, was caught providing material support of over US$150,000 to known ISIS-fronts in the countries of Pakistan, China, and Turkey.

Zoobia fraudulently acquired credit card numbers and used them online to purchase over $60,000 worth of bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies between March and June 2017. The funds were transmitted via wire transfer.

Zoobia was apprehended at John F. Kennedy airport in July 2017 while attempting to board a flight to Istanbul. Authorities suspect she was trying to find a backdoor into Syria to join ISIS.

Source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/new-york-woman-pleads-guilty-providing-material-support-isis

Who Is Impacted?

Payment processors facilitating virtual asset transactions.

Why This Matters?

Authorities today are using blockchain analysis tools to trace the origin and transfer history of blockchain assets, including cryptocurrencies like bitcoin. These tools, when used to identify the source of funds, are capable of fighting fraud and the financing of terrorism, like in the case of Zoobia Shahnaz from New York.

Anyone participating in the value-chain of digital assets plays a role in combatting this kind of online fraud. Trading Platforms, Payment Processors, OTC Brokers, and Money Services Businesses bear the responsibility of identifying their customers, monitoring their transactions, and reporting suspicious activity.

What’s Next?

With the appropriate KYC and AML tools in place, fraud by stolen credit card can be prevented in the future. Had a live face match been performed on Zoobia when she tried to use someone else’s stolen personal credit information, it is unlikely she would have able to acquire the cryptocurrency she used in her scheme.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement
Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement

With the world of financial crime constantly shifting and evolving, navigating illicit activities has become increasingly complex. Two prominent crimes within the financial sector are money laundering and embezzling, and while both do pose significant risk to...

Special Report: The Compliance Trilemma for Digital Assets

Special Report: The Compliance Trilemma for Digital Assets

A cross-disciplinary research team from the University of British Columbia (UBC) conducted an industry study spanning the compliance, assurance, and technology requirements that financial institutions, legal and accounting firms need to see in place before digital assets can be used at scale in their sectors. Hundred of hours of interviews with industry experts across 13 leading financial jurisdictions explored the past, present, and future state expectations that are blocking the industry adoption of digital assets, security tokens, tokenized payments, and digital identity from diverse perspectives.

iComply Investor Services Inc, in partnership with the Government of Canada, Mitacs, and the University of British Columbia commissioned the study in order to better understand the challenges that token issuers face to meet the regulatory standards for issuing and tracking digital assets. Currently, these projects face significant barriers that result in trade-offs – hindering the true potential of blockchain managed assets. The research collaboration was supported by Mitacs’s Accelerate Program.

The Findings:

The use of blockchain technology allows token issuers to efficiently gain access to global customers, partners, and capital.

Key Challenge: The burden of the cost of regulation

Challenges broadly stem from the cost of complying with regulation. In 2017 there was significant ambiguity surrounding whether and how digital assets were regulated, and many issuers neglected this dimension altogether. While a large number of issuers were well-intentioned, others could not resist exploiting the prospect of unlimited access to global investors. Early offerings could often raise more with savvy marketing than a well-reasoned project plan, and a large number of early token offerings were little more than Ponzi schemes. Today, regulatory clarity and enforcement are essential if tokenized securities are to become a safe and legitimate fundraising mechanism.

The study found that issuers currently face a compliance trilemma, whereby they can realize only two of the following three goals in their token offerings:

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Widely distributed investors
  • Regulatory compliance

While we focus here on ICOs, the compliance trilemma also holds more generally for other decentralized finance practices involving cryptoassets including ICOs, STOs, TGEs, and IEOs.

To date, issuers have adopted various approaches to address the trilemma:

  • Sacrificing compliance by directly defying regulators and hoping to fly under the radar
  • sacrificing the scope of investment by restricting token sales to a limited group of investors
  • Compromising on all three dimensions in a hybrid approach
  • Forgoing a token offering entirely until this becomes more cost-effective

However, each of these current approaches is sub-optimal, and a solution is needed to the compliance trilemma.

The study also explored how industry experts expected the compliance trilemma to be resolved and found that the majority tended to advocate new regulatory rules and definitions that could relax what they see as the “burden” of compliance on issuers. Such an approach places the onus squarely on regulators, who would need to coordinate within and across jurisdictions to reach a coherent regulatory framework that appeases the challenges and costs of compliance for issuers. However, we argue that holding regulators solely accountable for the compliance trilemma is incomplete and misguided, and that other approaches are needed to reduce the costs and uncertainties of regulatory compliance.

 

Read the research by downloading the report here

 

About iComply Investor Services Inc.
iComply Investor Services Inc. (iComply) is an award-winning software company focused on reducing regulatory friction in the capital markets. With powerful data, verification, tokenization solutions, iComply helps companies overcome the cost and complexity of multi-jurisdictional compliance to effectively access new markets. Learn more: iComplyIS.com

Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement
Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement

With the world of financial crime constantly shifting and evolving, navigating illicit activities has become increasingly complex. Two prominent crimes within the financial sector are money laundering and embezzling, and while both do pose significant risk to...

The Future of Fungibility

The Future of Fungibility

“Due to the precision of software and mathematics, cryptocurrencies are some of the most fungible assets in the world.” – World Crypto Index

A dollar is a dollar is a dollar
In today’s world of digital currencies, attention has been heavily placed on security tokens because they are subject to regulation and typically tied to assets with real-life value (real estate, companies etc.). These tokens appeal to investors because real-life assets provide a means to measure the actual value of the tokens, making their value more tangible and potentially more akin to fiat currencies. Ironically, fiat money was once itself backed by gold  – the gold standard meant that banks accepted these notes for gold; however, in 1971 this was terminated and money was no longer backed by anything of real value. When you consider this reality – there may actually be some merit in applying value to tokens over fiat currencies.  

Security Token Offerings
Interest in security tokens has grown significantly, and governments such as the Gibraltar government, are seeking an extension to its license so that it may provide a security token exchange on its servers – which would be centralized. While this initially sounds like progress – this walled garden approach is founded on flawed thinking. The appeal of the crypto market for many is that it is decentralized and is based on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks without intermediaries. Reliance on the Gibralter government or any other government undermines this philosophy.

P2P networks maintain the fungibility of cryptocurrencies because and there is no threat to the value of these assets being reduced arbitrarily in an open, decentralized market. Conversely, centralized exchanges have been known to selectively reduce the value of particular tokens at their discretion,  for example – when a token is of unknown origin the exchange may elect to reduce its value. In the world of fiat currencies, a dollar is a dollar is a dollar…and, currency values should not be reduced – but rather, compliance procedures should be actively implemented.

Centralization Doesn’t Equal Security
Centralization typically means points of weakness regarding security, stability, and a fair market. Most banks operate using a centralized database. It only takes one qualified hacker to code their way through the system and access the information needed to rob people of their life-savings. We also don’t know how “fit” the individual verifying values and transactions really is. The combination of cryptography and “sharing the burden” with a P2P network allows decentralized mediums like blockchain to enforce a secure value transfer.

Programmatic Compliance
There are many ways to enable compliant secondary trading without centralization. A viable alternative to the walled garden approach is embedding compliance into a token during token issuance. By using an accredited issuance platform, regulatory requirements are applied at the token level and this approach does not limit trading to one or few centralized exchanges but instead propagates trading across many decentralized exchanges.

Decentralization Protects More Than Just the Value of Your Tokens
In the early days of the world-wide-web desktop computers communicated directly to servers and other desktop computers. However, with the proliferation of digital giants like Facebook, personal information has become increasingly stored in centralized data banks by third-parties which have resulted in major data breaches such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which Facebook profiles were harvested for the purpose of steering the 2016 political election. Decentralization means that these breaches can be more easily avoided.

Increased security and the ability to trade in larger and more liquid environments all make decentralization increasingly appealing. By removing third-parties the blockchain becomes a trusted ledger where all assets are equal – and wasn’t this the point?

Challenges of Decentralization
From a legal and financial perspective, aspects of decentralization do not come without challenges. For instance, global peer to peer indexing allows anyone to post a buy or sell order, against market rates, using a smart contract to fulfill the order, rather than an exchange. Compliance practices such as KYC and AML, as well as due diligence checks, are necessary to ensure the integrity of the blockchain ledger as a trusted record of trades – especially when the token is determined to be a security.

If compliance is embedded at the token level and value is assigned correctly to each token then trade in-between tokens and value systems offer fungibility in its optimal form. Security tokens and decentralization bring improvements to traditional financial products by removing the middleman from investment transactions. This removal has a ripple effect leading to lower fees, faster deal execution, free market exposure, a larger potential investor base, automated service functions and so on.

A New Source of Truth
The world is changing, decentralization and tokenization are no longer foreign concepts. The traditional and decentralized economies are becoming more integrated, and the preservation of asset-fungibility on peer-to-peer networks is successfully occurring without intermediaries.

Once an asset is tokenized using blockchain it can trade much more efficiently, but this does not eliminate the need for compliance. This means a shift in the status quo and regulations for both traditional and decentralized finance.

About Prefacto
Prefacto is a token compliance tool offering free audited smart contracts, global best-in-class KYC/AML for over 160 countries, source of funds reports to help issuers open bank accounts after completing a crowdsale, and programmatic secondary trade management. Register now:
https://platform.prefacto.net/Account/Register

About iComply Investor Services Inc.
iComply Investor Services Inc. (iComply) is an award-winning software company focused on reducing regulatory friction in the capital markets. With powerful data, verification, tokenization solutions, iComply helps companies overcome the cost and complexity of multi-jurisdictional compliance to effectively access new markets. Learn more: iComplyIS.com

Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement
Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement

With the world of financial crime constantly shifting and evolving, navigating illicit activities has become increasingly complex. Two prominent crimes within the financial sector are money laundering and embezzling, and while both do pose significant risk to...

Compliance Beyond the Initial Offering

Compliance Beyond the Initial Offering

So you’ve issued a token, and things seem to have gone off without a hitch; however, that doesn’t mean that your compliance days are over – you’re still responsible for that token and the source of wealth for the person who holds it.

Unchecked secondary trading of tokenized asset opens the door to sanctions violations, facilitation of money-laundering and the ability for bad actors to use your token to fund the next terrorist attack.  

The use of blockchain in finance continues to grow exponentially – from central bank adoption to micropayments – with more successful use cases moving from pilots to production implementations. Perhaps no area has grown as much as the use of smart contracts to create “tokens”, fractional ownership units for private equity, debt, real estate, and funds. 

Awareness and usage of cryptocurrency have proliferated in recent years, with 2017 bringing an estimated $680 million of investment into blockchain assets. However, this dramatic growth was met with an equally dramatic number of scams and security breaches, with $23 million being lost daily due to malicious actors, gaps in compliance or sheer negligence.

This rapid growth comes as no surprise for those that have endured the inefficiencies, redundancies, and even human error or manipulation in the finance industry. These are some of the issues that have pre-empted the dramatic growth of the crypto and digital finance space at large.

Decentralization of financial services meant freedom from bureaucracy, gouging fees and piles of paperwork. Clearly, this was attractive. Financial services haven’t truly been disrupted at this level since the introduction of the banks themselves, which provided a trusted intermediary for transactions.

With Great Freedom Comes Great Responsibility
Despite its benefits, decentralization has also meant little protection for those choosing to engage in the early, wild west days of cryptocurrency. But this all changed forever in June of 2017 when the SEC announced that ICOs could be subject to securities laws.

As an issuer – from the moment you issue a token, you are responsible for that token for the rest of its existence. If an ineligible purchaser or a bad actor takes ownership of the token, perhaps via from one of the many crypto exchanges operating in grey markets or with meager KYC/AML requirements – the issuer is put at risk.

Multi-Jurisdictional Compliance
Running to Malta or the Bahamas also doesn’t change this requirement. One of the biggest knowledge gaps in this market is awareness of the fact that compliance isn’t actually about where the issuer is – but where the investor is. And each new locale – be it national or at the local level (various states in the U.S. have different rules around securities). Even if KYC/AML screening is adequate in one state, the requirements will likely vary and may even take on a different meaning in a different jurisdiction. Politically Exposed Persons Screening (PEP) varies significantly across different nations.  

Hair of the Dog – Programmatic Compliance
Interestingly, it is the same decentralized and public blockchain ledgers that opened the minds of the world to the benefits of decentralization (and gave us the wild-west of cryptocurrency) that also have the ability to technologically surpass the highest standards of compliance, integrity, and transparency of any multinational bank or financial institution.

iComply makes it possible for token issuers and investors to rely on Prefacto™ compliance, which means that the tokens have been developed to commit only those transactions which adhere to the rules that have been programmed into them. These rules could be securities laws for security tokens or other rules required for a particular utility token (eg. Sale restrictions).

See how iComply addresses these issues with a personalized demo.

About iComply Investor Services Inc.
iComply Investor Services Inc. (iComply) is an award-winning software company focused on reducing regulatory friction in the capital markets. With powerful data, verification, tokenization solutions, iComply helps companies overcome the cost and complexity of multi-jurisdictional compliance to effectively access new markets. Learn more: iComplyIS.com

Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement
Distinguishing Money Laundering from Embezzlement

With the world of financial crime constantly shifting and evolving, navigating illicit activities has become increasingly complex. Two prominent crimes within the financial sector are money laundering and embezzling, and while both do pose significant risk to...

Vaidyanathan Chandrashekhar

Vaidyanathan Chandrashekhar

Advisors

“Chandy,” is a technology and risk expert with executive experience at Boston Consulting Group, Citi, and PwC. With over two decades in financial services, digital transformation, and enterprise risk, he advises iComply on scalable compliance infrastructure for global markets.
Thomas Linder

Thomas Linder

Advisors

Thomas is a global tax and compliance expert with deep specialization in digital assets, blockchain, and tokenization. As a partner at MME Legal | Tax | Compliance, he advises iComply on regulatory strategy, cross-border compliance, and digital finance innovation.
Thomas Hardjono

Thomas Hardjono

Advisors

Thomas is a renowned identity and cybersecurity expert, serving as CTO of Connection Science at MIT. With deep expertise in decentralized identity, zero trust, and secure data exchange, he advises iComply on cutting-edge technology and privacy-first compliance architecture.
Rodney Dobson

Rodney Dobson

Advisors

Rodney is the former President of ADP Canada and international executive with over two decades of leadership in global HR and enterprise technology. He advises iComply with deep expertise in international service delivery, M&A, and scaling high-growth operations across regulated markets.
Praveen Mandal

Praveen Mandal

Advisors

Praveen is a serial entrepreneur and technology innovator, known for leadership roles at Lucent Bell Labs, ChargePoint, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator. He advises iComply on advanced computing, scalable infrastructure, and the intersection of AI, energy, and compliance tech.
Paul Childerhose

Paul Childerhose

Advisors

Paul is a Canadian RegTech leader and founder of Maple Peak Group, with extensive experience in financial services compliance, AML, and digital transformation. He advises iComply on regulatory alignment, operational strategy, and scaling compliance programs in complex markets.
John Engle

John Engle

Advisors

John is a seasoned business executive with senior leadership experience at CIBC, UBS, and Accenture. With deep expertise in investment banking, private equity, and digital transformation, he advises iComply on strategic growth, partnerships, and global market expansion.
Jeff Bandman

Jeff Bandman

Advisors

Jeff is a former CFTC official and globally recognized expert in financial regulation, fintech, and digital assets. As founder of Bandman Advisors, he brings deep insight into regulatory policy, market infrastructure, and innovation to guide iComply’s global compliance strategy.
Greg Pearlman

Greg Pearlman

Advisors

Greg is a seasoned investment banker with over 35 years of experience, including leadership roles at BMO Capital Markets, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup. Greg brings deep expertise in financial strategy and growth to support iComply's expansion in the RegTech sector.
Deven Sharma

Deven Sharma

Advisors

Deven is the former President of S&P and a globally respected authority in risk, data, and capital markets. With decades of leadership across financial services and tech, he advises iComply on strategic growth, governance, and the future of trusted data in AML compliance.