U.S. Targets Bank M.Y. Safra in First-Ever Crypto AML Action

U.S. Targets Bank M.Y. Safra in First-Ever Crypto AML Action

U.S. Targets Bank M.Y. Safra in First-Ever Crypto AML Action

OCC Hits New York-Based Bank with First Ever Enforcement Action for Lack of Crypto AML Compliance

What Happened?

February 27, 2020: The U.S. OCC (Department of Treasury Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) took action publicly against M.Y. Safra Bank is the first in a new wave of enforcement for VASPs (virtual asset service providers).

According to the OCC order, the AML policies and procedures MYSB had in place were ineffective at identifying whether their clients were transacting with stolen or laundered virtual assets, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum cryptocurrencies and security tokens.

This inability to identify, investigate, or report this suspicious activity further prevented the bank from filing the appropriate SARs (suspicious activity reports) with FinCEN.

Source: https://www.occ.gov/static/enforcement-actions/ea2020-005.pdf

Who Is Impacted?

Any VASP–banks, crypto-exchanges, OTC desks, fintechs, etc.–dealing with virtual assets and serving U.S. customers.

Why This Matters?

The action taken against M.Y. Safra Bank is a strong indication that bank regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve Bank, and the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have already gathered enough information on VASPs to begin a campaign of targeted enforcement.

It also demonstrates that these regulators expect VASPs to have the capacity to identify and properly assess the risk of the clients and transactions they are serving. The regulator gives clear direction that the AML obligations of traditional finance apply to any virtual asset transaction.

What’s Next?

The MYSB board of directors has 60 days to respond with a comprehensive compliance program that is able to stand up to stress testing from an independent third party.

VASPs serving US users, clients, or investors should be able to clearly demonstrate that their KYC, risk screening, blockchain forensics, and transaction monitoring tools are integrated into an effective AML program – backed by comprehensive, written policies and procedures manuals, and audited by an independent expert.

Furthermore, compliance teams should review their AML providers to ensure they are not just paying for a KYC onboarding tool or identity verification APIs.

Ongoing monitoring programs are required – existing users should be screened regularly for AML risk such as whether they have appeared on global sanctions, watchlists, or adverse media risks, and whether they represent political exposure.

For iComply clients, our ongoing monitoring feature will perform these tasks on a daily basis and only provide alerts if a new risk is identified. Speak with your account manager for more information.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions
Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions

Online identity verification is an essential component of modern digital security. As cyber threats continue to evolve, robust identity verification solutions are necessary to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory...

European Union Blacklists Non-Cooperative Tax Havens

European Union Blacklists Non-Cooperative Tax Havens

European Union Blacklists Non-Cooperative Tax Havens

EU Targets Cayman Islands, Panama, Seychelles, and Palau For Lack of Beneficial Ownership Transparency And Abusive Tax Practices

What Happened?

February 28, 2020: The European Union blacklisted four additional jurisdictions–Cayman Islands, Panama, Seychelles, and Palau. The EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions helps member states deal more robustly with countries that encourage abusive tax practices.

Source: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-list-of-non-cooperative-jurisdictions/

Who Is Impacted?

Businesses engaged in transactions with entities (individuals, organizations, or governments) based in, or operating through, the listed jurisdictions.

Why This Matters?

Entities operating in or through blacklisted countries will have increased difficulty accessing funding programs. Private capital transactions may be subject to significant withholding taxes, and companies operating in or through these jurisdictions must implement additional compliance measures.

What’s Next?

Effective January 1, 2021, EU member states will be required to implement measures for any transaction with entities based in Grand Cayman, Seychelles, Panama, and Palau. Member states are required to implement at least one of four tax measures before this date. Tax measures can include withholding tax on any funds sent to the listed jurisdiction, enhanced AML screening requirements for foreign beneficial ownership and control, and restrictions on tax deductions.

The targeted jurisdictions will have to demonstrate cooperation with the EU in the form of changes to corporate ownership and tax transparency. The EU blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions is updated twice a year; the next update will occur in October 2020.

Investors based in the EU can remain invested in funds based in listed jurisdictions–such as the Cayman Islands, a major offshore hotspot for U.S. institutional investors. However, new transactions may be subject to additional reporting, withholding tax (which can drastically increase the cost of making an investment), or other measures which may vary significantly between EU member states.

Compliance teams should review their obligations to identify all related parties under the EU Mandatory Disclosure Regime (DAC 6). For example, any payment involving an entity related to an entity in the Cayman Islands may need to report the activity to the “home country” within 30 days as per DAC 6. Reporting requirements are expected to take effect as of July 1, 2020. 

For online financial service providers in the EU, KYC onboarding tools must be able to distinguish between entity types, such as natural persons vs legal or incorporated entities. Corporate onboarding tools should be tested to ensure they can accurately identify and verify related parties–such as everyone with control or beneficial ownership in the company–involved in the transaction. Where a transaction has a related party operating from or through this jurisdiction, enhanced due diligence and government reporting may be required.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions
Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions

Online identity verification is an essential component of modern digital security. As cyber threats continue to evolve, robust identity verification solutions are necessary to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory...

Regulators Take Action Against Online FX Broker JT Trader

Regulators Take Action Against Online FX Broker JT Trader

Regulators Take Action Against Online FX Broker JT Trader

BCSC Says “Global” Platform For Institutional and Retail Clients Operating Without a License

What Happened?

February 26, 2020: The BCSC announced that JT Trader Financial Services Ltd. was serving residents of British Columbia without a license to do so. According to its website, JT Trader is an online foreign exchange broker that offers cutting-edge trading tools to institutional and retail clients globally.

Source: https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Enforcement/Investment_Caution_List/JT_Trader_Financial_Services_Ltd_/

Who Is Impacted?

Financial service providers offering foreign exchange, virtual asset, or fintech solutions serving audiences in multiple states (United States), provinces (Canada), or countries (Global). Risk managers for online payment services and money transfer businesses–such as Meastro, Visa, Mastercard, and WebMoney who serve JT Trader–will need to identify and reassess their own risk in doing business with and enabling these transactions for JT Trader.

Why This Matters?

According to the BCSC, JT Trader was operating out of Toronto, in the Canadian province of Ontario. Ontario is regulated by the OSC (Ontario Securities Commission). Both BCSC and OSC are members of the CSA (Canadian Securities Administrators). Due to the nature of JT Trader’s business, they will need to secure regulatory approval from every provincial regulator where they have at least one user.

What’s Next?

JT Trader’s actions have placed the company on several international watchlists and adverse media lists. Companies who serve JT Trader will need to complete risk assessments to determine if they can continue to support their business activity.

Compliance teams should consider whether their AML tools can easily identify what jurisdiction their user is from and whether they are legally able to serve the user.

If the proper licenses are in place and the user is accepted, the KYC and AML procedures need to meet the regulatory requirements of the user’s jurisdiction. An intelligent AML program should enforce country-specific workflows for user authentication, identity verification, document verification, risk screening, and data privacy.

Business managers should ensure their compliance teams are not wasting money and resources on users from jurisdictions that the company is not able to serve and, subsequently, should not be onboarding.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions
Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions

Online identity verification is an essential component of modern digital security. As cyber threats continue to evolve, robust identity verification solutions are necessary to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory...

Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi Adopt the FATF Travel Rule

Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi Adopt the FATF Travel Rule

Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi Adopt the FATF Travel Rule

Regulators in Asia & Middle East Roll Out FATF R15.7b

What Happened?

February 24, 2020: Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi joined South Korea, Switzerland, and Singapore in adopting new policies and amendments to comply with the Virtual Asset recommendations made by global financial watchdog FATF.​

Sources:
Hong Kong – https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/mer4/MER-Hong-Kong-China-2019.pdf
Abu Dhabi – https://www.adgm.com/media/announcements/fsra-updates-its-virtual-asset-regulatory-framework

Who Is Impacted?

Any VASP, as well as dealers in precious metals, stones, and jewelry, operating in Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi. This includes, but is not limited to, custody providers, trading platforms, and investment platforms.

Why This Matters?

Pending a period of public consultation, businesses now have a closing window of opportunity to bring their systems, policies, and procedures in-line with the changes included in these updates – especially if they want to continue to serve customers in Hong Kong or Abu Dhabi.

What’s Next?

Enforcement. As we saw in the United Kingdom (effective January 10, 2020) or in Singapore under the new PSA (Payment Services Act), businesses have a short window to contract an independent firm to audit their compliance systems and processes, to fill gaps in their AML program and software, and to file regulatory paperwork.

As we saw in Canada, Singapore, and the United Kingdom, this increased clarity from the regulators in Abu Dhabi and Hong Kong is expected to create problems for businesses with weak or non-existent AML programs. Today, many digital asset firms in both countries are operating without institutional-grade compliance tools for onboarding, KYC refresh, AML screening, and transaction monitoring. It is likely that the firms that are not using cost-effective solutions or have not budgeted for compliance in their business model, will either cease to exist or look to be acquired – potentially transferring their liability baggage to their acquirer.

Dealers in precious metals, stones, and jewelry are also impacted and must now implement an AML program capable of maintaining a risk-based approach for their business. This is similar to the art and collectibles industry in the United Kingdom who were taken by surprise in January when they discovered that they were now required to implement AML programs. This increase in operating cost is likely to drive significant changes to these business models as enforcements begin.

Compliance teams should review user data including IP addresses, geofencing, the jurisdiction of nationality, and jurisdiction of domicile to identify potential exposure to these new regulations. Potential risks should be assessed and written AML policies and procedures should be reviewed against the new requirements.

VASP executive teams, major shareholders, and board members should take actions to limit their personal liability and exposure–such as ensuring their staff receives updated AML training, having their AML tools audited by an independent professional, and ensuring the new costs of compliance do not hinder the viability of the business.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions
Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions

Online identity verification is an essential component of modern digital security. As cyber threats continue to evolve, robust identity verification solutions are necessary to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory...

Regulators Take Action Against Online FX Broker JT Trader

Securities Commissions Targets OTC and Virtual Asset Trading Platform BitPrime

Securities Commissions Targets OTC and Virtual Asset Trading Platform BitPrime

Regulators Take Action Against Bitprime Ltd For Onboarding Users Without Local Licensing.

What Happened?

February 20, 2020: The BCSC identified that due to an inadequate KYC & AML program, Bitprime Ltd was onboarding clients they were not allowed to serve. BitPrime operates a platform that offers the retail trading of cryptocurrency assets.

Source: https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Enforcement/Investment_Caution_List/Bitprime_Ltd__dba_Bitprimeprofx/

Who Is Impacted?

Fintech platforms, wealth managers, VASPs, and financial service providers who are serving users, clients, or investors in more than one jurisdiction.

Why This Matters?

Many online financial services businesses who have acquired licensing in a single jurisdiction believe that their license means they can serve the world.

This regulatory action shows that the BCSC, along with other IOSC (International Organization of Securities Commissions) members – which includes the U.S., the EU, Canada, Australia, and others – have a very different opinion on the matter.

The reality is, you can only serve the jurisdictions where you have both a license to operate in and a compliance program in place capable of meeting the local regulations of your user.

What’s Next?

BitPrime’s actions have placed the company on several international watchlists and adverse media lists. Companies and virtual asset traders who do business with BitPrime may now be subject to increased regulatory scrutiny, and they are likely to start showing up in the more sophisticated blockchain forensics tools.

To avoid this situation, BitPrime could have used a digital onboarding tool that had the capability to identify the prospective user’s jurisdiction, preventing those user accounts from being created.

While this is a relatively simple gap to close, most fintech platforms do not understand how vital it is to screen for this type of risk.

In order to avoid these regulatory actions, fintech platforms should test their compliance systems to ensure their onboarding tools can reject a user based on jurisdiction. Furthermore, these tools should be smart enough to identify and reject these users without incurring the full cost of KYC.

Executives should ensure their compliance teams are saving time and money by not wasting resources through onboarding and screening clients that the business is not able to serve.

learn more

Is your AML compliance too expensive, time-consuming, or ineffective?

iComply enables financial services providers to reduce costs, risk, and complexity and improve staff capacity, effectiveness, and customer experience.

Request a demo today.

Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions
Key Features of Digital Identity Verification Solutions

Online identity verification is an essential component of modern digital security. As cyber threats continue to evolve, robust identity verification solutions are necessary to protect sensitive information and maintain regulatory...