« Back to Glossary Index

Ongoing monitoring is a continuous process used by financial institutions and other regulated entities to review and assess customer activities and transactions to detect and prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes. It ensures that the customer’s risk profile remains current and that any suspicious activities are identified and reported promptly.

Key Points:

  1. Purpose: The primary objective of ongoing monitoring is to ensure that customer activities are consistent with the institution’s knowledge of the customer, their business, and their risk profile. It helps detect unusual or suspicious behavior that may indicate financial crimes.
  2. Components of Ongoing Monitoring:
    • Transaction Monitoring: Continuously analyzing transactions to identify patterns, anomalies, and activities that deviate from expected behavior. This includes monitoring for large, frequent, or unusual transactions.
    • Customer Profile Updates: Regularly updating and reviewing customer information to ensure it is accurate and reflects any changes in the customer’s risk profile, business activities, or personal circumstances.
    • Risk Reassessment: Periodically reassessing the risk level of customers based on updated information and monitoring results, adjusting the intensity of monitoring accordingly.
    • Enhanced Monitoring for High-Risk Customers: Applying more rigorous monitoring procedures for high-risk customers, including those involved in high-risk industries, jurisdictions, or transactions.
  3. Techniques for Ongoing Monitoring:
    • Automated Systems: Utilizing software and technology to automate the monitoring process, enabling real-time analysis of large volumes of transactions and activities.
    • Rules-Based Monitoring: Implementing predefined rules and thresholds to flag transactions that exceed certain limits or meet specific criteria.
    • Behavioral Analytics: Using advanced analytics and machine learning to identify unusual patterns and behaviors that may indicate suspicious activity.
    • Manual Reviews: Conducting manual reviews of flagged transactions and activities by compliance officers to assess the context and determine if further investigation is warranted.
  4. Regulatory Requirements:
    • Financial Action Task Force (FATF): Provides international standards and guidelines for ongoing monitoring as part of broader AML and CTF measures.
    • Local Regulations: Jurisdictions have specific AML laws and regulations that mandate ongoing monitoring of customer activities and transactions.
  5. Challenges in Ongoing Monitoring:
    • Data Quality and Integration: Ensuring access to high-quality, comprehensive data from various sources and integrating it into monitoring systems.
    • False Positives: Balancing the need to detect suspicious activities with the challenge of managing false positives, which can overwhelm compliance resources.
    • Evolving Threats: Adapting monitoring systems to address evolving money laundering and terrorist financing methods.
  6. Examples of Ongoing Monitoring Practices:
    • A bank uses an automated transaction monitoring system to flag transactions that exceed a certain dollar amount or involve high-risk jurisdictions.
    • A financial institution updates a customer’s risk profile after detecting a significant change in their transaction patterns, prompting enhanced monitoring and due diligence.
    • A compliance team reviews flagged transactions manually to determine if they are consistent with the customer’s known business activities and risk profile.
  7. Reporting and Response:
    • Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs): Filing SARs with regulatory authorities when suspicious activities are detected.
    • Internal Escalation: Escalating identified risks and suspicious activities within the organization for further investigation and action.
    • Customer Communication: Contacting customers to verify and understand unusual activities when appropriate, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
  8. Penalties for Non-Compliance: Failure to implement effective ongoing monitoring can result in significant penalties for financial institutions, including fines, regulatory sanctions, and reputational damage.
« Back to Glossary Index